|
|
Translate:
              International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
Sunday, June 17th, 2007 Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre to call for International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act, Independent Scientist/DU Radiation Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the establishment of an International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007. Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of “The International 9/11 Citizen’s War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law.” According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq), to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide, and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy. DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT: Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, “Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort….” The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre. The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals—U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld—and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution. A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows. For the full Congressional Memorandum, please go to the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act Website: I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House. II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained commend and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, 4th generation mini-nuclear weapons, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - or with the use of exotic Directed Energy Weapons - implies their involvement in the latter as well. III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld. 9/11 & DU at the Pentagon In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military’s illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of U.S. military regulations. The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007. Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001. Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the crash site rubble was radioactive and that it was probably Depleted Uranium (DU) contaminating the Pentagon crash site rubble. The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term “punch-out hole” was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole. This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators. Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext. IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident—given the truth of the official account—that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school. V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization. VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects—prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military—that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.” The establishment of an International 9/11 Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11. The Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the Act. The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff. The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions. Have Your Say: International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
The Financial Mess and Washington’s Wars Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 08:24 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
L'Humanite in English Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 08:18 PM Dennis Kucinich on the Democrats’ Bailout Betrayal Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 08:10 PM Controversy Grows As Taser Expands Scope Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 08:08 PM Don't miss this chance Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 08:03 PM The campaign grows Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 07:59 PM Debts the way to do it Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 07:54 PM Will There Be A Second Cold War? Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 07:41 PM EVENT HIDDEN ON INDYMEDIA - Films they don't want you to see Last post by Unregistered @ 07:15 PM International Action Day "Freedom not fear - Stop the surveillance mania!" on 11 Oct Last post by Unregistered @ 07:11 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Another Education is Possible Censorship and Freedom of Speech Lies, Crimes and Cover-ups - Human Rights Watch in Venezuela |
rick commented on: McCain-Palin Campaign Increasingly Staffed by Bush Administration Officials Look at the fact that all these elected or unelected officials are... Continue Reading & Reply rick commented on: 200 Years of Standing Up to U.S. War Lies After serving 20 yrs in the us army, I’ve been researching any and everything associated with... Continue Reading & Reply Jeffrey Peter commented on: War vets to talk about US atrocities The Cambodian genocide is said to be orchestrated by the US implied in a televised interview of... Continue Reading & Reply Chilled Dude commented on: Smoking Ban To Hit Amsterdam Coffee Shops Cop tries choking to get evidence: Yeah, pot is real bad if he were to have swallowed it, so... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
