旅館禁止9/11英雄
由米克・ Meaney
RINF選擇新聞
五次尊敬了英雄,并且,在Peterborough,英國預定前個人在雙塔外面,威廉羅德里格斯講話,直到事件組織者被迫使取消。
威廉羅德里格斯當前開始歐洲遊覽,包括許多英國。
事件地點在Peterborough,公牛旅館,淹沒了與電話和電子郵件請求一個解釋從公眾的懊惱成員,因為它是完全地不能接受的禁止在可怕事件9/11期間,拯救數百生命的一個真正的英雄。
Apparently the hotel pulled out following a letter from a member of public stating that they had witnessed a 9/11 truth activist being sworn at and spat upon during promoting the event. One of the event organisers, Ian Barrett, confirms this attack did take place and it does not explain why the hotel pulled out.

Mr Barrett said: “Why this incident should concern the hotel is beyond us and we are shocked at this decision has been taken, especially in light of the fact that our promotion of the event has been extremely well received with a number of local councillors and prominent local authority figures having confirmed their attendance.
“All of our leafleting has been very well received bar this solitary incident incited by a member of public with an obvious lack of self discipline or moral regard.”
We must wonder why this could possibly lead to the banning of William Rodriguez, who was due to speak on the 19th of June.
Another twist has accrued, with the Bulls hotel having now changed their story.
The Bull hotel is now saying: “The booking was withdrawn following a complaint from a member of the public who received abuse from the organisers/supporters promoting the event in Kings Lynn.
“We had considered the matter very carefully, and with the hotel’s excellent reputation the decision was taken to withdraw this event taking place.
“We do have the right to withdraw bookings where the hotel’s reputation may be damaged.”
Event organisers argue this reason is a fabrication.
On numerous occasions, when attempting to speak to the hotel manager, I received the same response several times from members of staff: “I’m afraid he is in a meeting”.
Other calls have been terminated as well as being left on hold for hours. If you fancy your luck, give the hotel a call on 01733 561364.
A statement from event organisers has been issued to the Bull Hotel:
“What concerns me is the fact that the nature of the complaint has changed since my conversation with yourself on 5th June, at which point you stated that the complaint received had been from a member of public who had witnessed another member of public swearing at our leafleter, Phil, and spitting at his camera. You stated that this was the basis for the manager’s view that the event may damage the reputation of the hotel and, therefore, the basis for his decision in cancelling the booking.
“It is extremely interesting, a full week after you advised us of your decision, that you were not able to give the various callers to your hotel a reason as to why you chose to cancel this event, in some cases actually choosing to avoid the issue by hanging up. Today, you are stating a different account to the one you gave to myself, a change which has massive implications for us in that it highlights us as the aggressors, conveniently giving the hotel just cause for its decision.
“I would like to remind you that whilst some of our activism may appear radical to many, we always do so in a peaceful manner, indeed taking pride in being a part of the Peace movement. The nature of our group’s subject unfortunately means that we sometimes encounter aggressive reactions from the general public and we try our best to remain calm in such circumstances.
“I would, therefore, be grateful if you could provide me with the following information. I appreciate you cannot give me some specifics due to Data Protection obligations:-
- At what time did the alleged incident occcur?
- What specific abuse was alleged to have been received by the complainant?
- What were the circumstances of the incorrect information about the nature of the complaint given to me during our telephone conversation on 5th June?
- To what extent have you gone to investigate the alleged incident?
- Why did you not choose to discuss the alleged incident with our organisation at any time before
- Why was Annie Machon, the organiser of this internationally recognised hero’s UK Tour and various other events throughout Europe ignored by the hotel manager having left over half a dozen phone calls to discuss this matter?”
False Flag Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Hotel Bans 9/11 Hero' :
3 Responses to “Hotel Bans 9/11 Hero”
-
pingback:
Posted: Jun 15th, 2007 at 10:40 pm | Link to this
No More Heroes Thanks, We’re British. « Textual Relations -
pingback:
Posted: Jun 20th, 2007 at 11:06 pm | Link to this
William Rodriguez - the last man out of WTC alive « It’s time to say “When.” -
pingback:
Posted: Jul 6th, 2007 at 4:35 am | Link to this
» Second UK Hotel Bans William RodriguezReply[…] is the second time that William Rodriguez has been banned from a British hotel. Last month RINF reported that a hotel in Peterborough had cancelled a presentation from William Rodriguez, citing an attack […]
Related News:














裝貨…














[…] Heroes”. Whatever Happened To All The Heroes? Well, they get banned from hotels, according to this story. How on Earth does a man honoured for his bravery not once, not twice, not three times, or even […]