Executions sought for 9/11 defendants處決尋求9 / 11名被告
The head of the Pentagon’s war crimes tribunal approved death penalty charges Tuesday against five alleged Sept. 11 conspirators, including confessed 主管五角大樓的戰爭罪行法庭核准死刑的收費星期二對五指稱9月11日陰謀，包括交待 9/11 9 / 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.主謀哈立德謝赫穆罕默德。
Prosecution of a sixth suspect, so-called 20th hijacker Mohammed al-Qahtani, was dropped.起訴第六懷疑，所謂的第二十劫機犯穆罕默德-卡赫塔尼，是下降。
The tribunal’s convening authority, Susan Crawford, referred to trial the cases against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and alleged Al Qaeda collaborators Waleed bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi.法庭的召開管理局，蘇珊克勞福德，提到審判的案件，哈立德謝赫穆罕默德，以及據稱蓋達組織的合作者（ Waleed本阿塔什，拉姆茲比納爾謝赫，阿里阿卜杜勒阿齊茲阿里和艾哈邁德穆斯塔法- hawsawi 。 All are in jail at the US Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.都是在監獄中在美國的海軍基地在古巴關塔那摩灣。
Under the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the defendants must be arraigned within 30 days of the referral of charges, and trials must begin within four months.根據軍事委員會的行為， 2006年，被告必須提審的30天內，轉介費，和審判必須開始在4個月內。
The arraignments, at the Guantanamo war crimes court, will be the first public appearance of the defendants since their captures after the attacks.該arraignments ，在關塔那摩的戰爭罪行法庭，將是首次公開露面的被告，因為他們捕捉後的攻擊。 They are accused of plotting the 2001 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a crash site in Pennsylvania.他們被指控策劃2001年襲擊，死亡近3000人在世界貿易中心，五角大樓和墜機地點在賓夕法尼亞州。
Crawford noted that the charges against Qahtani in February were dismissed “without prejudice,” meaning the Pentagon could reinstate them later.克勞福德指出，該起訴卡赫塔尼在2月被解僱， “無偏見”的含義，五角大樓可能恢復他們稍後。
Mohammed and the four others face trials for alleged conspiracy, murder in violation of the laws of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, terrorism and material support for terrorism.穆罕默德和另外4人面對審判涉嫌陰謀，謀殺案，案中違反了戰爭法，攻擊平民，攻擊民用物體，故意造成嚴重的身體傷害，毀壞財產，恐怖主義和材料對恐怖主義的支持。
All but Hawsawi also are charged with hijacking aircraft for their alleged roles in preparing the attacks.所有，但hawsawi也被控以劫持飛機，他們被指稱的角色，在準備攻擊。
See More: 看到更多的： USA News 美國新聞Have Your Say: Executions sought for 9/11 defendants 你說：處決尋求9 / 11名被告
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的我們的新論壇
One Response to “Executions sought for 9/11 defendants” 1回應“處決尋求9 / 11被告”
Charlie Castelnau 查理卡斯特勞
Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 1:45 pm | 發布時間： 2008年5月15日在下午1時45分| Link to this 鏈接到本
Free Newsletter 免費通訊 
Related News 相關新聞
- US drops 9/11 ‘hijacker’ charges美國下降9 / 11 '劫持'收費
- Guantánamo detainees said to face 9/11 trial關塔那摩被拘留者說，面對9 / 11審判
- Guantanamo Prisoner Charged in Embassy Attack關塔那摩囚犯被控在大使館的攻擊
- Six Gitmo detainees face death, officials say 6關塔那摩被拘留者面對死亡，官員說，
- Pentagon Censors 9/11 Suspect’s Tape五角大樓檢查員9 / 11疑犯的磁帶
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- ‘Challenging Authority’ '富有挑戰性的權威'
- Torture Policies Undermine 9/11 Case酷刑政策，破壞9 / 11案例
- Guantanamo official says he’s not resigning關塔那摩官員說，他不辭職
- China Says Quake Death Toll Could Top 50,000中國說，地震死亡人數可能頂端50000
- McCain: Most Troops Will Be Home by 2013馬侃：大多數部隊將在家中2013
- Watchdog: European DNA Database a Potential Nightmare看門狗：歐洲DNA資料庫的一個潛在的噩夢
- Top Activist’s Detention Blot on Democracy最活躍的拘留污點，民主
- White House denied knowledge of military analyst program白宮出面否認知識的一位軍事分析家的計劃
- President Bush should be impeached for war crimes美國總統布什應該被彈劾的戰爭罪行
- Blair recalls despair at Bush’s victory布萊爾回顧絕望在布什的勝利
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔
So “murder in violation of the laws of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, terrorism and material support for terrorism” is against the law in USA?因此， “謀殺案，案中違反了戰爭法，攻擊平民，攻擊民用物體，故意造成嚴重的身體傷害，毀壞財產，恐怖主義和物質支持恐怖主義”是違反法律，在美國呢？
Then surely someone can start a lawsuit against the US Administrations that terrorised / attacked civilians / violated the laws of war etc against - let’s see:然後，一定有人可以開始起訴美國政府認為恐怖/攻擊平民/違反了戰爭法等反對-讓我們看看：
Korea韓國
Vietnam越南
Panama巴拿馬
Nicaragua尼加拉瓜
Grenada格林納達
Iraq伊拉克
I know, I’ve left quite a few countries out, and many of the US perpetrators are dead now, but why did no-one pursue these criminals at the time, or did they?我知道，我已經留下了不少國家，和許多美國的肇事者已經死亡，現在，但為什麼沒有人追求這些罪犯在時間，或他們？
It is evident that “Holocaust” or “Terrorism” is not something that the nice, homely US leaders indulge in. No, it is known then as “Pre-emptive defence”.很顯然， “大屠殺”或“恐怖主義”是不是一件尼斯，家居的美國領導人沉迷英寸沒有，這是眾所周知的，然後作為“先發製人辯護” 。 Sounds much better doesn’t it!聽起來好得多不！