<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executions sought for 9/11 defendants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/</link>
	<description>Breaking News, Alternative News &#38; Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Castelnau</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/comment-page-1/#comment-56131</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Castelnau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/executions-sought-for-911-defendants/3478/#comment-56131</guid>
		<description>So "murder in violation of the laws of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, terrorism and material support for terrorism" is against the law in USA?
Then surely someone can start a lawsuit against the US Administrations that terrorised / attacked civilians / violated the laws of war etc against - let's see:
Korea
Vietnam
Panama
Nicaragua
Grenada
Iraq
I know, I've left quite a few countries out, and many of the US perpetrators are dead now, but why did no-one pursue these criminals at the time, or did they? 
It is evident that "Holocaust" or "Terrorism" is not something that the nice, homely US leaders indulge in. No, it is known then as "Pre-emptive defence". Sounds much better doesn't it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8220;murder in violation of the laws of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, destruction of property, terrorism and material support for terrorism&#8221; is against the law in USA?<br />
Then surely someone can start a lawsuit against the US Administrations that terrorised / attacked civilians / violated the laws of war etc against - let&#8217;s see:<br />
Korea<br />
Vietnam<br />
Panama<br />
Nicaragua<br />
Grenada<br />
Iraq<br />
I know, I&#8217;ve left quite a few countries out, and many of the US perpetrators are dead now, but why did no-one pursue these criminals at the time, or did they?<br />
It is evident that &#8220;Holocaust&#8221; or &#8220;Terrorism&#8221; is not something that the nice, homely US leaders indulge in. No, it is known then as &#8220;Pre-emptive defence&#8221;. Sounds much better doesn&#8217;t it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
