最新ニュース | フォーラム | イギリスのニュース | 米国のニュース | 全体的なニュース | 政治ニュース | Sci技術のニュース | 戦争及びテロリズムのニュース | スポーツのニュース | マルチメディア | ホームページを置きなさい |
|
![]() |
|
9/11人の任務の椅子は公式の証拠が真実にはほど遠い`」だったことを是認する
木曜日、2007年9月13日
9/11の任務の椅子は今それらが与えられた公式の証拠が真実にはほど遠い`」だったことを是認する。 9/11の後の6年、アメリカの公衆はまだ米国の歴史の単一の最も大きい恐怖の攻撃の完全で、正直な記述を与えられてしまわなかった。 それらが得た何に七面鳥だった。 9/11人の任務 役人によってひかがみを切られた 妨害. それは決して確認することを起こったことの2001年9月11日に全真実をどうにかして。 9/11の任務、それぞれトマスKeanおよびリーハミルトンの椅子そして副椅子は彼らの本で、主張する、 先例なし、それそれらはあった「失敗する組み立て」資金の空腹が適切な調査をするためにあり。 それらはまた真実へのアクセスを否定されたことを確認する 誤解させる 米国国防総省および中央政府航空権限の高官によって; 認めている9/11人の長官および職員による多くの公共の声明にもかかわらずそれらはずっと9/11の任務へあることのために繰り返しに、ない単一人満たされたり、試みられたり、また更に懲戒されている、あった。 最初から、任務は跛を引いたようである。 それは攻撃の後の年にわたるまでの仕事を始めなかった。 そして、委託権限は調査の疑いをもって狭く、不思議そうに限られた力レポートの不足分-何百万の証拠のページによってふるい分け、何百もの重要な手がかりとなる証人にインタビューするやっと年--を助けにならずに作り出すための時間枠だった。 最終 レポート 何が起こったかの様々な記述の主証拠および無視された深刻な変則を検査しなかった。 長官は是認する彼らのレポートがあったことを 不完全 そして台なしにされて、それは恐怖の攻撃についての多くの質問未解答に残り。 それにもかかわらず、9/11の任務は2004年8月21日に素早く閉まった。 私は陰謀理論を信じない。 私は知られていた事実によってふるい分ける好み、重大な精査に立ち向かう結論を出すのに専門家の意見を利用する厳密な、証拠基づかせていた分析を。 すなわち、私は9/11の任務によってがなかったすべてを信じる。 The failings of the official investigation have fuelled too many half-baked conspiracy theories. Some of the 9/11 “truth” groups promote speculative hypotheses, ignore innocent explanations, cite non-expert sources and jump to conclusions that are not proven by the known facts. They convert mere coincidence and circumstantial evidence into cast-iron proof. This is no way to debunk the obfuscations and evasions of the 9/11 report. But even amid the hype, some of these 9/11 groups raise valid and important questions that were never even considered, let alone answered, by the official investigation. The American public has not been told the complete truth about the events of that fateful autumn morning six years ago. What happened on 9/11 is fundamentally important in its own right. But equally important is the way the 9/11 cover-up signifies an absence of democratic, transparent and accountable government. Establishing the truth is, in part, about restoring honesty, trust and confidence in American politics. There are dozens of 9/11 “truth” websites and campaign groups. I cannot vouch for the veracity or credibility of any of them. But what I can say is that as well as making plenty of seemingly outrageous claims; a few of them raise legitimate questions that demand answers. Four of these well known “tell the truth” 9/11 websites are: 1) Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which includes academics and intellectuals from many disciplines. 2) 250+ 9/11 ‘Smoking Guns’ a website that cites over 250 pieces of evidence that allegedly contradict, or were omitted from, the 9/11 Commission report. 3) The 911 Truth Campaign that, as well as offering its own evidence and theories, includes links to more than 20 similar websites. 4) Patriots Question 9/11, perhaps the most plausible array of distinguished US citizens who question the official account of 9/11, including General Wesley Clark, former Nato commander in Europe, and seven members and staffers of the official 9/11 Commission, including the chair and vice chair. In all, this website documents the doubts of 110+ senior military, intelligence service, law enforcement and government officials; 200+ engineers and architects; 50+ pilots and aviation professionals; 150+ professors; 90+ entertainment and media people; and 190+ 9/11 survivors and family members. Although this is an impressive roll call, it doesn’t necessarily mean that these expert professionals are right. Nevertheless, their scepticism of the official version of events is reason to pause and reflect. More and more US citizens are critical of the official account. The respected Zogby polling organisation last week found that 51% of Americans want Congress to probe President Bush and Vice-President Cheney regarding the truth about the 9/11 attacks; 67% are also critical of the 9/11 Commission for not investigating the bizarre, unexplained collapse of the 47-storey World Trade Centre building 7 (WTC7). This building was not hit by any planes. Unlike WTC3, which was badly damaged by falling debris from the Twin Towers but which remained standing, WTC7 suffered minor damage but suddenly collapsed in a neat pile, as happens in a controlled demolition. In a 2006 interview with anchorman Evan Soloman of CBC’s Sunday programme, the vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, was reminded that the commission report failed to even mention the collapse of WTC7 or the suspicious hurried removal of the building debris from the site - before there could be a proper forensic investigation of what was a crime scene. Hamilton could only offer the lame excuse that the commissioners did not have “unlimited time” and could not be expected to answer “every question” the public asks. There are many, many more strange unexplained facts concerning the events of 9/11. You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to be puzzled and want an explanation, or to be sceptical concerning the official version of events. Six years on from those terrible events, the survivors, and the friends and families of those who died, deserve to know the truth. Is honesty and transparency concerning 9/11 too much to ask of the president and Congress? What is needed is a new and truly independent commission of inquiry to sort coincidence and conjecture from fact, and to provide answers to the unsolved anomalies in the evidence available concerning the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. Unlike the often-stymied first investigation, this new commission should be granted wide-ranging subpoena powers and unfettered access to government files and officials. George Bush should be called to testify, without his minders at hand to brief and prompt him. America - and the world - has a right to know the truth. Have Your Say: Chair of 9/11 Commission admits official evidence was ‘far from the truth’ Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Saudi judge sentences pregnant gang-rape victim to 100 lashes for committing adultery Last post by A Prophet @ 06:59 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Land of the free. LOL - not anymore its not! Last post by Victor @ 06:51 PM How to Invest in the Green Technology Revolution Last post by Unregistered @ 06:12 PM Amazing text-to-speech software Last post by loki @ 04:20 PM Spy in the Sky, the new copper chopper? Last post by Nostalgia @ 03:02 PM Bioviolence will become a greater threat as the technology becomes more accessible. Last post by Nostalgia @ 02:16 PM Ukash delivers that cashless society we've all heard about Last post by Nostalgia @ 02:00 PM Orwellian Doublethink: "Nationalize the banks." "Free Markets." Last post by loki @ 01:29 PM UK sees diabetes cases rise by three-quarters Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:17 PM Blunkett warns over ?Big Brother? Britain Last post by Victor @ 01:02 PM Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive
|
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Facebook now owns your content - forever Facebook backtracks on TOS; Privacy changes still coming later |
Pat commented on: RINF Launches Web Hosting Service We would like to know when Mr Meaney, the webmaster will either put up or web hosting or return to us our... Continue Reading & Reply Royal Brown commented on: Over 60% of People Do Not Trust the Government [quote post="3618"]How can one trust an institution that perpetually lies and spreads... Continue Reading & Reply Troy E Lewis commented on: Family wants answers after Taser death My name is Troy E Lewis. I worked with Orlando in La. at the GM plant in Shreveport. I am so... Continue Reading & Reply coffee commented on: Facebook backtracks on TOS; Privacy changes still coming later the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |