Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked剑桥大学双塔理论反击
Dr Seffen Paper Proven Ludicrous 博士seffen文件证明可笑
By Mick Meaney由米克meaney
RINF Alternative News rinf另类新闻
In late 2007 a British academic, Dr. Keith Seffen of the University of Cambridge, published a new在2007年底，英国学术，博士基思seffen的大学，剑桥大学，出版了一本新 mathematical analysis数学分析 of the collapse of the World Trade Centre – however the paper contains several ridiculous claims.对倒塌的世界贸易中心-不过该文件包含几个荒谬的索赔。 Now a formal request has been made by Mr JA Blacker MSc IMI, who recently debunked the paper, to Dr. Chris Burgoyne, the Head of the Department of Engineering at Cambridge University, highlighting these errors and appealing for the misleading paper to be corrected.现在正式请求已取得了由司法机构政务长黑海安IMI公司，他们最近反击的文件，以博士克里斯burgoyne ，部领导，工程于剑桥大学，突出了这些错误，并呼吁该具误导性的文件来加以纠正。
The request points out that Dr Seffen’s paper defies several key laws of physics, ie conservation of momentum and conservation of energy.要求指出，博士seffen的文件违抗几个关键物理定律，即养护的势头，并节约能源。
Mr Blacker’s request also states:黑先生的请求，还规定：
“All the floors offered the same flimsy resistance, when in fact each had different construction characteristics, is beyond any logic as the lower floor core columns were over double the thickness compared to the upper floors.” "所有楼层提供同样站不住脚的阻力，而实际上，每一个有不同的建筑特色，是超越任何逻辑，因为较低层的芯柱均超过一倍的厚度相比，楼上" 。
Such glaring errors should be an embarrassment to one of the world’s oldest and most prestigious universities.这种明显的错误，应该是一个尴尬的世界上的一个最古老和最有声望的大学。
Dr Seffen’s paper essentially claims that a falling body can fall through the path of most resistance.博士seffen的纸张基本上宣称某种自由落体运动，可透过秋天的道路上的最大阻力。 Such a claim is ludicrous and defies all logic or honest scientific integrity.这种索赔是可笑的，并公然藐视所有的逻辑或科学诚实正直。
Another inaccuracy in the paper is the fact it does not take into account the energy needed to convert the 300,000 tons of concrete and steel to dust.另一种不准确的在文件中是这样一个事实，它没有考虑到能源需要转换成30万吨的混凝土与钢尘埃。
“The Seffen analysis is based on the columns being a hollow box construction. " seffen分析是基于该栏目作为一个空心方块建设。 What about cross bracing?” states Mr Blacker.如何交叉支撑吗？ "国家主席黑。
“The Seffen paper claims that burning jet fuel in air can weaken ALL the steel girders evenly (hence symmetrical collapse due to gravity of all columns perfectly), yet both ends of these outer and inner massive columns were outside the fire zone to differing degrees hence heat would have conducted up and down very efficiently at different rates, and many columns were not even subjected to any significant fire. " seffen文件声称燃烧喷气燃料在空气中，可以削弱所有钢梁均匀（对称，因此崩溃，由于重力的所有栏目完美） ，但两边的这些内在和外在的庞大柱外火区在不同程度上，因此热队将已进行了上下非常有效率地在不同的利率，许多栏目甚至没有遭受任何重大火灾。 Are we really expected to believe that fire can weaken steel evenly despite the core columns conducting heat efficiently at varying rates away from varied regions of temperature?”我们是否真的可望相信火警可以削弱钢均匀，尽管芯柱进行热效率地处于不同的利率距离不同地区的温度" ？
Simply put, for the University of Cambridge to continue supporting this absurd theory is to present a fictional view of physics.简言之，为大学，剑桥大学继续支持这种荒谬理论，是一个虚构的看法物理学。
Download the request here in PDF format下载请在这里PDF格式 . 。
False Flag 虚假国旗 Science 科学 Section has more related reports 科更多相关报道 Help keep RINF going..有利于保持rinf去..Comment on 'Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked' : 评论'剑桥大学双塔理论反击' ：
7 Responses to “Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked”七反应"剑桥大学双塔理论反击"
Anders Bjorkman 安德斯比约克曼
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 4th, 2008 2008年2月4日
At 2:50 pm 在下午2时50分Winston Fahrenheit 温斯顿华氏
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 5th, 2008 2008年2月5日
At 9:21 pm 在下午9时21分Reply答复Seffen has shown himself to be worthy of the Cambridge MA he proudly lists amongst his qualifications. seffen显示他无愧于剑桥马他骄傲的名单当中，他的资格。 This automatic MA is awarded to Cambridge and Oxford graduates to reflect the fact that a 3 year Cambridge undergraduate is more demanding academically than one undertaken at the University of Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Sheffield, Bristol, Southampton, Liverpool etc.这种自动马中标者是剑桥和牛津毕业生，以反映这样一个事实，即三年剑桥本科，是更为严格的学业成绩比一个在英国曼彻斯特大学，格拉斯哥，伯明翰，谢菲尔德，布里斯托尔，南安普敦，利物浦等。
250+ Engineers and hundreds of other Scientists have come forward to state that the official 9/11 story is a gigantic MYTH. 250 +工程师和数以百计的其他科学家已经出面说明官方9 / 11故事，是一个庞大的神话。 Not a single Cambridge MA in sight, surprisingly.没有一个单一的剑桥马在望，令人惊讶。 Seffen is a jack ass and his MA is toilet paper, proof here: seffen是一个千斤顶驴和他的马是卫生纸，证据在这里： http://www.ae911truth.org
and here:在这里： http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_ALL_ http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_all_Joe 乔
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 6th, 2008 2008年2月6日
At 2:45 pm 在下午2时45分Reply答复I am imagining the upper floors above the plane, to be likened to a martial artists hand about to strike a stack of concrete blocks.我想象楼上以上的飞机，就好像武术艺术家之手即将罢工一叠混凝土砌块。
Why would you think that its striking force could not break all the blocks below it?为什么你会觉得它的打击力量不能打破了所有大厦在它的下面？ Is martial arts impossible to prove mathematically?是武侠无法证明的数学吗？Winston Fahrenheit 温斯顿华氏
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 6th, 2008 2008年2月6日
At 4:34 pm 截至下午4时34分Reply答复The Martial artist when encountering the resistance of the blocks continues with a force greater than the underlying force resisting his hand, thus overcomes resistance.武侠艺术家的时候，遇到的阻力三座继续按照目前的力量大于潜在力量抗拒他的手，从而克服了阻力。
Secondly does the martial artist turn the blocks into power at the same time?其次，是否戒严艺术家把块到电力在同一时间？ Does the giant oak turn itself sawdust because of a fire in some of its branches?请问巨橡树把自身建设木屑，因为火灾中，它的一些分支？
You can not extrapolate the model of the martial artist to the collapse of the twin towers.你不能推断该模型的武侠艺术家倒塌的双塔。 Unless of course your name happens to be Seffen or you hold a Cambridge MA.除非当然，你的名字正好是seffen或你持有的剑桥马。
In this scenario, the underlying steel frame and steel core were designed to resist the mass/load from above.在这种情况下，潜在的钢架和钢芯被设计用来抵御大众/负载从以上。 When you see the building collapse at near free fall speed, like an apple falling from a tree don’t you question - where was the resistance from the core below?当你看到一私人违章建筑物倒塌，在附近的自由落体速度一样，一个苹果掉下树，你不问题-他们到底有没有阻力由核心下面？ When you see the concrete turning to dust in 10 seconds don’t you wonder where did this energy come from?当你看到具体谈到粉尘在10秒不，你不知道在哪里，这能量从何而来？ Each floor or set of floors hitting the structure below, even in a weakened state (and it’s not proven that it was in a weakened state) would have slowed somewhat - so how is the freefall collapse in 10 seconds explainable?每一楼层或一套楼层打到结构下面，即使在削弱国家（而且它并不证明，它是在减弱，州） ，将有减缓有点-怎么是f reefall崩溃，在1 0秒钟可以解释的呢？
I urge you to *READ* the statements, background and QUALIFICATIONS posted by more than 250 QUALIFIED ENGINEERS:我在此呼吁大家，以*阅读*报表，背景和资历所张贴的250多名合格的工程师： http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_ALL_ http://www.ae911truth.org/supporters.php?g=_all_
If you are still unconvinced and believe the flawed martial arts theory you have suggested above, I suggest you enrol in a course of Mathematics or Physics here:如果你仍然不服气的，并相信有缺陷的武术理论，你有上述建议的，我建议你报读课程的数学或物理学在这里： http://www.open.ac.uk
W Paul Blakey 瓦特保罗Blakey ）
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 6th, 2008 2008年2月6日
At 9:52 pm 在下午9时52分Reply答复Regardless of the pancake theory being correct or not, the question should be: what caused Building 7 to collapse in exactly the same manner?不论以何种煎饼理论被正确与否，关键的问题应该是：是什么使建设7至崩溃完全相同的方式？ This has yet to be satisfactorily explained.这还没有得到令人满意的解释。
Let’s stop getting sidetracked here.让我们停止越来越侧这里。 My wife works in a daycare.我的妻子工程，在一个日托。 When you want to get a three year old to stop doing something you distract them (look at the cuddly bunny).当你想获得三年旧停止做一些你分心，他们（看看在化身兔兔） 。 The same technique is being used to keep people’s attention away from the Pentagon and Building 7.同样的技术正在被用来保持人们的注意力从五角大楼和建设7 。
Grow up.长大了。 Think for yourself.想想自己。 Question authority.问题的权威。
3 year old kid 3岁的孩子
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 6th, 2008 2008年2月6日
At 10:24 pm 在下午10时24分Reply答复911 was an inside job and thanks to people who actually have the brains to Debunk the 911 Cambridge lies as opposed to just making sly comments, I as a 3 year old kid am very greatful. 911是一个内部就业和感谢的人，其实都开动脑筋，揭穿911剑桥的谎言为反对只狡猾的评论，我作为一个3岁的孩子很感激。
Now, were is that Cuddly Bunny?现在，是化身为兔兔？
Ahhhh its just fallen through Building 007 at freefall and followed the path of most resistance. ahhhh其刚刚跌至通过建设007在freefall和遵循的道路，大部分阻力。
3 year old kid 3岁的孩子
Posted: 张贴：
Feb 6th, 2008 2008年2月6日
At 11:10 pm 在下午11时10分Reply答复See the WTC being built here:看到世贸中心正在兴建中的位置：
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4744744660064858887
Have to have my milk now all filled with toxic poisons and growth drugs.必须有牛奶，我现在都充满有毒毒药和生长的药物。
Related News: 相关新闻：
Actually Seffen’s basic assumptions are ludicrious:其实seffen的基本假设是ludicrious ：
(1) the upper block begins to accelerate downwards as a rigid undamaged body with density 0.18 ton/m3, （ 1 ）上游座开始加速向下刚性完好无损体密度0.18 ton/m3 ，
(2) that the initial load imposed onto the structure beneath was exceptionally high and （ 2 ）表示，初步负荷施加于结构下方异常地高
(3) that the damage was bound to propagate. （ 3 ）有关的损害是必然宣传。
The upper block consisted mostly of air and its density 0.18 ton/m3 was similar to that of wool and it was not rigid.上层座主要包括空气和其密度0.18 ton/m3相似，可说是羊毛和它不是僵化了。 That it imposed an exceptionally high initial load is just a dream; it would just have bounced on top of the structure below, where no damage would even occur!它施加的是一个非常高的初始负荷只是一个梦，它只是有反弹顶部的结构下面，如果没有损坏，甚至会发生！
See见 http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm