RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com :突發新聞的替代 Friday, June 13th, 2008週五, 2008年6月13日 | ![]() |
Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞 |
9/11 widows demand release of CIA’s Inspector General report 9 / 11寡婦的需求釋放中央情報局的監察長的報告 Tuesday, June 19th, 2007 週二, 2007年6月19日 A group composed of widows of 9/11 victims are demanding the release of a key CIA report.一組組成的遺孀9 / 11的受害者是要求釋放的一個關鍵中情局的報告。 “The report, prepared by the CIA’s inspector general, is the only major 9/11 government review that has still not been made publicly available,” Michael Isikoff “報告,準備由中央情報局的監察長,是唯一的主要9 / 11檢討政府至今仍未公開, ”邁克爾isikoff reported in January報告在一月 . 。 “When it was completed in August 2005, Newsweek and other publications reported that it contained sharp criticisms of former CIA director George Tenet and other top agency officials for failing to address the threat posed by Al Qaeda, as well as other mistakes that might have prevented the attacks.” “當它完成於2005年8月, 新聞周刊和其他出版物報告說,它載有尖銳批評,前美國中央情報局局長特尼特和其他頂級機構的官員未能解決基地組織構成的威脅,以及其他錯誤,可能有預防該攻擊“ 。 In a statement obtained by在一份聲明中所取得 RAW STORY 原材料的故事 , September 11th Advocates Patty Casazza, Monica Gabrielle, Mindy Kleinberg, and Lorie Van Auken write, “Almost six years have passed since the attacks of September 11, 2001, yet critical information continues to be withheld from the American public regarding the attacks. , 9月11日主張派蒂casazza ,莫尼卡加布里埃,明迪科雷恩貝格, lorie車auken寫, “幾乎六年過去了,攻擊以來的01年9月11日,但重要的信息仍然被扣留來自美國公眾對於攻擊。 “In 2002, after reviewing the evidence produced by the Joint Inquiry of Congress into the 9/11 Attacks, both Republican and Democratic Congressmen agreed that a CIA Inspector General review into individual responsibility was necessary,” the statement continues. “在2002年,經過審查的證據,所產生的聯合調查,國會到9 / 11的攻擊,無論是共和黨政府和民主黨國會議員一致認為,中情局監察長檢討個人的責任是必要的, ”聲明繼續。 “Faced with the facts, these Congressmen understood that accountability in the Intelligence Community was crucial.” “面對事實,這些國會議員了解,問責制在情報界是至關重要的” 。 The 9/11 widows add, “Their intent was that a final declassified CIA/IG report be released to the public and where deemed appropriate by the report, for personnel at all levels to be held accountable for any omission, commission, or failure to meet professional standards in regard to the events of September 11, 2001. 9 / 11寡婦添加, “他們的意圖是,最後解密的中情局/免疫球蛋白報告公佈並在認為適當的報告,為各級人員要被追究責任的任何遺漏,佣金,或未能符合專業標準,在考慮到事件的2001年9月11日。 To date, despite enormous efforts from the Senate Intelligence Committee, nothing has happened.”迄今為止,儘管有巨大的努力,從美國參議院情報委員會,沒有發生“ 。 According to據 9/11Truth.org 9/11truth.org , a petition entitled “The Public’s Right to Know - Declassification and Release of Documents” ( ,一份請願書題為“公眾的知情權-解密並釋放文件” ( link鏈接 ) garnered over 15,000 signatures and was “hand delivered…to lawmakers in Washington, DC.” )獲得了超過1.5萬的簽名,是“手交付… …向國會議員在華盛頓哥倫比亞特區” 。 Further excerpts from September 11th Advocates’ statement:進一步摘錄從9月11日主張'的聲明: # #Michael Isikoff wrote in his January 2007 Newsweek article that, “When it [the CIA/IG report] was completed in August 2005, NEWSWEEK and other publications reported that it contained sharp criticisms of former CIA director George Tenet and other top agency officials for failing to address the threat posed by Al Qaeda, as well as other mistakes that might have prevented the attacks.”邁克爾isikoff中寫道,他於2007年1月新聞周刊文章指出, “當它[美國中央情報局/免疫球蛋白報告]完成於2005年8月,新聞周刊和其他出版物報告說,它載有尖銳批評,前美國中央情報局局長特尼特和其他頂級機構的官員未能為解決基地組織構成的威脅,以及其他錯誤,可能有阻止的攻擊“ 。 Isikoff goes on to say, “What’s really behind the intelligence community’s refusal to release the report, the senators suspect, is a desire to protect the reputations of some of the main figures.” isikoff接著說, “真正背後的情報界的拒絕釋放該份報告指出,參議員懷疑,是一個願望,以保護名譽的一些主要的數字” 。 Since sources and methods are not revealed in a declassified report, national security is protected and thus not an excuse for withholding this document.由於來源和方法都沒有透露在解密的報告,國家安全是保障,因此沒有為藉口,隱瞞此文件。 Since when does embarrassment meet any standard for keeping a government report secret?自何時尷尬滿足任何標準來衡量,保持一份政府報告的秘密? Isn’t it time for our elected and appointed officials to do the job that they were sent to our Nation’s Capitol for: to protect the public and not reputations?是不是時間,為我們的民選和任命官員做工作,他們被送往我們國家的首都為:保障公眾利益和不圖虛名? Americans have the right to know that the problems identified in this report have been addressed and corrected.美國人有權利知道所發現的問題在這份報告中得到了處理和糾正。 We have the right to know that competent people are serving us in strategic positions – our safety and security depends on it.我們有權利知道,主管的人在為我們服務的戰略地位-我們的安全和保障取決於它。 Incompetence costs lives.無能的生活費用。 Legislation, co-sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden D-OR and Kit Bond R-MO, calling for the release of the 9/11 CIA/IG report, already exists, has passed the Senate and has strong bipartisan support.立法,共同主辦的參議員羅恩wyden的D -或試劑盒和債券的R -鉬,要求釋放9 / 11中情局/免疫球蛋白的報告,已經存在,已經通過了參議院,具有很強的跨黨派的支持。 Yet, the White House and the CIA continue to refuse to release the already declassified version of the report.然而,白宮和中央情報局繼續拒絕釋放已經解密的報告文本。 It is sadly and abundantly clear that, once again, only heightened public pressure on the Administration and the CIA will force accountability.這是可悲的和非常清楚的,再次,只有提高公眾的壓力,政府和中央情報局將迫使問責制。 We call on the public and the press to demand the release of the declassified version of the 9/11 CIA’s Inspector General report.我們呼籲公眾和新聞界要求釋放解密版本的9 / 11中央情報局的監察長的報告。 Patty Casazza派蒂casazza # #See More: 看到更多的: False Flag 虛假國旗Have Your Say: 9/11 widows demand release of CIA’s Inspector General report 你說: 9 / 11寡婦的需求釋放中央情報局的監察長的報告 Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意,只有選定的評論將出版。 Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇 This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 19th, 2007 at 8:48 pm and is filed under 此項目被張貼於週二, 2007年6月19日在下午8時48分,並提交下 9/11 Truth 9 / 11真相 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應,此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ,或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。 | Translations 翻譯 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Free Newsletter 免費通訊 Related News 相關新聞
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞 Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表達的意見,在rinf新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者( S )和並不一定反映的意見,網站管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com :突破新聞與其他的媒體是copyleft的-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |