Breaking News 突发新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页

BREAKING NEWS 突发新闻

Saturday, May 24th, 2008 周六， 2008年5月24日

Pakistan Daily 巴基斯坦每日 | Twenty-five former US military officers have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation.  They include former commander of US Army Intelligence, Major General Albert Stubblebine, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Col. Ronald D. Ray, two former staff members of the Director of the National Security Agency; Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, and Major John M. Newman, PhD, and many others.  They are among the rapidly growing number of military and intelligence service veterans, scientists, engineers, and architects challenging the government’s story.  The officers’ statements appear below, listed alphabetically. | 05年前美国军官的严厉批评官方的帐户9 / 11 ，并呼吁建立一个新的调查，它们包括前指挥官，美军的情报，少将何俊仁stubblebine ，前副助理国务卿，国防部长，上校夏佳理d 。射线，两个前同事署署长国家安全局;中校克伦kwiatkowski ，博士，以及重大约翰米纽曼，博士，和其他许多，他们之间的数量迅速增加的军事和情报服务退伍军人，科学家，工程师，建筑师和具有挑战性的政府的故事。军官报表出现在下方，按字母顺序排列。

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD     “A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash.  It’s impossible,” said Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, US Air Force (ret).中校罗伯特鲍曼，博士学位“了很多这些信息片断，两者合计，证明官方的故事，这位官员阴谋论9 / 11是一群泔水，这是不可能的，说： ”中将中校。罗伯特鲍曼，博士，美国空军（退休） 。 With doctoral degrees in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Col. Bowman served as Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.与博士学位，在航空和核工程，鲍曼上校担任主任先进的空间计划发展下，总统福特和卡特。

“There’sa second group of facts having to do with the cover up,” continued Col. Bowman.  “Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible.  Who gained from 9/11?  Who covered up crucial information about 9/11?  And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place?  When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.” “还有第二组的事实，不必与掩饰， ”继续鲍曼上校“ 。一并这些事情证明，高水平的，我们的政府不想让我们知道到底发生了什么，谁负责，谁获得从9 / 11呢？谁掩盖了关键的资料，约9 / 11 ？ ，谁提出了明显虚假的故事9 / 11摆在首位？当你考虑到这些三件事一起，我认为情况是相当清楚地表明，奇摩高度置于个人在政府当局与所有道路，通过切尼“ 。

Regarding the failure of NORAD to intercept the four hijacked planes on 9/11, Col. Bowman said, “I’m an old interceptor pilot.  I know the drill.  I’ve done it.  I know how long it takes.  I know the rules.关于失败的激光束拦截被劫持飞机4 9 / 11 ，鲍曼上校说： “我一岁的拦截试验。据我所知，演习，我已经这样做，我知道需要多久才能，我知道规则。 … Critics of the government story on 9/11 have said: ‘Well, they knew about this, and they did nothing’.  That’s not true.  If our government had done nothing that day and let normal procedure be followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.” …批评政府的故事，对9 / 11说： '好，他们知道这一点，和他们没有做任何' ，这是不正确的。如果我们的政府没有采取任何这一天，让正常的程序之后，这些飞机，无论他们在哪里人，会被拦截，双塔仍然会常委会和数以千计的人死亡的美国人将仍然活着“ 。

During his 22-year Air Force career, Col. Bowman also served as the Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the US Air Force Institute of Technology.  He also flew over 100 combat missions in Viet Nam as a fighter pilot.在他22年的空军生涯中，上校鲍曼还担任过该系系主任航空工程和助理院长，美空军技术学院，他还飞越100的作战任务，在越南，作为战斗机飞行员。

Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom     Former US Air Force pilot Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom wrote in a 2007 statement to this author, “When 9/11 occurred I bought the entire government and mainstream media story line.  I was a lifelong conservative Republican that voted for Bush/Cheney, twice.  Curiosity about JFK’s death, after a late night TV re-run of Oliver Stone’s movie, got me started researching and digging for the truth about his assassins.杰夫中将dahlstrom美国前空军飞行员中将杰夫dahlstrom写在2007的声明，此作者的， “当9 / 11发生我买整个政府和主流媒体的故事线，我是一个终身保守的共和党人认为，投票给布什/切尼，两次。好奇肯尼迪的死因后，深夜电视重新运行的奥利弗斯通的电影，让我开始研究和挖掘真相，他的杀手。

“My research led me to a much more important and timely question: the mystery of what really did happen on 9/11.  Everything that seemed real, turned out to be false.  The US government and the news media, once again, were lying to the world about the real terrorists and the public murder of 2,972 innocents on 9/11. “我的研究，促使我更为重要和及时的问题：神秘的什么的确发生在9 / 11 ，一切似乎真实的，原来是虚假的。美国政府和新闻媒体，再次说谎以世界了解真正的恐怖分子和市民的谋杀案2972无辜9 / 11 。
“The ‘Patriot Act’ was actually written prior to 9/11 with the intention of destroying the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  It was passed by Congress, based upon the government’s myth of 9/11, which was in reality a staged hoax.  9/11 was scripted and executed by rogue elements of the military, FAA, intelligence, and private contractors working for the US government. “ '爱国者法案' ，实际上是事先获得书面同意，以9 / 11与意图破坏美国宪法和人权法案，这是美国国会通过的，基于政府的神话9 / 11 ，这是在现实中一上演的骗术。 9 / 11是脚本和执行的无赖分子的军事，安哥拉武装部队，情报和私营机构承办工作的美国政府。

“In addition to severely curtailing fundamental rights of Americans, the 9/11 crime was then used by this administration, the one I originally voted for and supported, to justify waging two preemptive wars (and most likely a third war), killing over 4,500 American soldiers, and killing over one million innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. “此外，严重削减的基本权利的美国人， 9 / 11犯罪当时所用的政府，一个本来我赞成和支持，理由发动先发制人的战争，二（和最有可能是第三次战争） ，造成超过4500美国士兵，并杀害超过百万无辜的阿富汗和伊拉克人民。

“It was all premeditated.  Treason, a false flag military operation, and betrayal of the trust of the American people were committed on 9/11 by the highest levels of the US government and not one person responsible for the crimes, or the cover-up, has been held accountable for the last six years. “这是所有有预谋的。叛国，虚假国旗的军事行动，和背叛的信任，对美国人民承诺对9 / 11 ，由最高级别的美国政府，而不是一个人的罪行负责，或隐瞒，已被追究责任，为过去6年。

“After reading fifteen well-researched books, studying eight or nine DVD documentaries, and devoting months of personal research and investigation, I have arrived at one ultimate conclusion: The American government and the US Constitution have been hijacked and subverted by a group of criminals that today are the real terrorists.  They are in control of the US government and they have all violated their oaths of office and committed treason against their own citizens.” “后，读15 ，以及研究的书籍，学习8或9的DVD纪录片，抓个月内，个人的研究和调查，我已经到了一个最终的结论：美国政府和美国宪法已被劫持，破坏由一群罪犯今天是真正的恐怖分子，他们是在控制的美国政府，它们都无一例外地侵犯了他们的宣誓办公室和承诺叛国罪本国公民“ 。

Capt. Daniel Davis     Capt. Daniel Davis is a former US Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director.  After his military service, Capt. Davis served for 15 years as a Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division and then devoted an additional 15 years as founder and CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company.上尉丹尼尔戴维斯上校丹尼尔戴维斯是美国前陆军防空主任和挪威交通谘询委员会主任后，他的兵役，上校戴维斯任职15年，作为一个高级经理通用电气透平（喷射）发动机部，然后用一额外的15年，作为创办人兼行政总裁轮机技术服务公司，涡轮（喷气发动机）的服务和维修公司。

In a statement to this author, Capt. Davis wrote, “As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire.  Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed.  Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon?  If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.”在一份声明中向笔者，上校戴维斯写道， “作为前通用电气透平工程专家和经理，然后总裁兼首席执行官涡轮工程公司，我可以保证，没有高科技，高温合金引擎，任何有关4架飞机坠毁于9 / 11将完全摧毁，焚烧，粉碎或融化在任何事故或火灾。破坏了，是的，但不是销毁。何处，所有这些引擎，特别是在五角大楼？如果喷气动力飞机坠毁， 9 / 11 ，这些引擎，再加上翅膀和尾部大会，将有“ 。
Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam, Capt. Davis also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area.装饰与青铜明星和战士们英勇勋章，根据消防和紫心受伤，在越南，上校戴维斯也曾任职于陆军防空指挥耐克导弹电池管制人员为芝加哥-密尔沃基防御区。

Capt. Davis continued, “Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control.  No way!  With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there’s no way all four of them could!上校戴维斯续说： “此外，根据我的经验，作为一名官员在挪威作为一个战术主任芝加哥-密尔沃基防空和作为当前的私人飞行员，是没有出路的一个飞机上仪器的飞行计划（所有商业航班IFR预计）不会被拦截，当他们偏离他们的飞行计划，关闭其转发器，或停止的沟通与空中交通管制。没有出路！与极坏的运气，也许可以一滑，但没有有没有出路的所有四个他们可以！

“Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is difficult for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757.  Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled ‘terrorists’.  Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ does not change the truth.  It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the State’.” “最后，把话说过头山和公路和撞毁五角大楼的权利，在墙/地面接口是很难，甚至一个小缓慢，单引擎飞机并没有办法为757 ，也许最好的试验在世界上可以完成，但不这些非技术性的'恐怖分子' 。企图掩盖事实，称他们为'阴谋论'并不能改变事实。看来， '的东西是烂在国家' “ 。

Major Jon I. Fox is a former US Marine Corps fighter pilot and a retired commercial airline pilot for Continental Airlines with a 35-year commercial aviation career.  In 2007, in support of the Architects and Engineers[3] petition to reinvestigate 9/11, he wrote, “On hearing the military (NORAD/NEAD) excuses for no intercepts on 9/11/2001, I knew from personal experience that they were lying.  I then began re-checking other evidence and found mostly more lies from the ‘official spokesmen’.  Jet fuel fires at atmospheric pressure do not get hot enough to weaken steel.  Structures do not collapse through themselves in free fall time with only gravity as the powering force.”主要琼一，福克斯是美国前海军陆战队的战斗机飞行员和一名退休的商业航空公司的飞行员为美国大陆航空公司与35年的商业航空事业。在2007年，在支持的建筑师和工程师[ 3 ]呈请重新9 / 11 ，他写道： “对听力的军事（挪威/ nead ）的借口，没有拦截对2001年9月11日，我知道从个人的经验，他们在说谎。然后我开始重新检查的其他证据，并发现大多更在于从官方的代言人' 。喷气燃料火灾在大气压力没有得到足够的热点，以削弱钢。结构不崩溃，通过自己在自由降落的时间只有重力作为驱动力量“ 。

Commander Ralph Kolstad     Retired US Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot Commander Ralph Kolstad started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event.  In a statement to this author, he wrote, “It just didn’t make any sense to me,” he said.  And now six years after 9/11 he says, “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.”指挥官拉尔夫kolstad退休的美国海军高层枪'试点指挥官拉尔夫kolstad开始质疑官方帐户9 / 11几天内的活动。在一份声明中向笔者，他写道： “这只是没有做任何意义，我他说： “和现在六年后， 9 / 11他说， ”当一个人开始使用他自己的态度，而不是什么一被告知，是很少相信在官方的故事“ 。

Commander Kolstad was a top-rated fighter pilot during his 20-year Navy career.  Early in his career, he was accorded the honor of being selected to participate in the Navy’s ‘Top Gun’ air combat school, officially known as the US Navy Fighter Weapons School.  The Tom Cruise movie “Top Gun” reflects the experience of the young Navy pilots at the school.  Eleven years later, Commander Kolstad was further honored by being selected to become a ‘Top Gun’ adversary instructor.指挥官kolstad是一个一流的战斗机飞行员在他20年的海军生涯。早在他的职业生涯，他被授予的荣誉被选中参加在海军的'顶端枪'空战学校，正式名称为美国海军战斗机武器学校。汤姆克鲁斯的电影“顶端枪” ，反映的经验，年轻的海军飞行员在学校。十一年后，指挥官kolstad进一步荣幸被选中成为'顶端枪'的对手导师。
Commander Kolstad had a second career after his 20 years of Navy active and reserve service and served as a commercial airline pilot for 27 years, flying for American Airlines and other domestic and international careers.指挥官kolstad了第二个职业生涯后，他20多年的海军积极和储备服务，并担任一家商业航空公司飞行员27年，飞行的美国航空公司和其他国内和国际的事业。 He flew Boeing 727, 757 and 767, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and Fokker F-100 airliners.他飞抵波音727 ， 757和767 ，麦道MD - 80 ，和一架Fokker F - 100客机。 He has flown a total of over 23,000 hours in his career.他飞到总额超过二点三万小时在他的职业生涯。

Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon.  He says, “At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying.  I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.”指挥官kolstad是特别重要的帐户，美洲航空公司的航班77据称，撞向五角大楼。他说， “在五角大楼，试验的这架波音757客机确实有不少的壮举飞行，我有六○○○小时的飞行时间在波音公司757和767的，我不可能飞到它的方式飞行路线被称为“ 。

Commander Kolstad adds, “I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft.  I could not have done what these beginners did.  Something stinks to high heaven!”指挥官kolstad补充说， “我也是一个海军战斗机飞行员和空中打击导师和有经验的飞行，低空高速飞机，我不能做什么，这些初学者没有。 stinks一些高天堂” ！

He points to the physical evidence at the Pentagon impact site and asks in exasperation, “Where is the damage to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings?  Where are the big pieces that always break away in an accident?  Where is all the luggage?  Where are the miles and miles of wire, cable, and lines that are part and parcel of any large aircraft?  Where are the steel engine parts?  Where is the steel landing gear?  Where is the tail section that would have broken into large pieces?”他指出，物证在五角大楼的影响，网站，并要求在无奈地“ ，哪里是损害的墙上，五角大楼从两翼哪是大的作品始终摆脱在一出事故了吗？那里是所有的行李？那里是英里和英里的电线，线缆，和线的重要组成部分，任何大型飞机？哪里钢铁引擎零件？哪里是钢起落架？哪里是尾节会分解成大块？ “

But no major element of the official account of 9/11 is spared from Commander Kolstad’s criticism.  Regarding the alleged impact site of United Airlines Flight 93 near Shanksville, PA, he asks, “Where is any of the wreckage?  Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only a hole!  Where is any piece of a crashed airplane?  Why was the area cordoned off, and no inspection allowed by the normal accident personnel?  Where is any evidence at all?”但没有的主要组成部分之一的官方帐户9 / 11是不遗余力地从指挥官kolstad的批评，对于被指控的影响，网站的美国航空93号班机近shanksville ，坝，他问： “哪里是任何飞机残骸？所有图片我所看到的，只有一个洞！何处是任何一块一失事飞机为何是地区封锁，并没有检查所允许的正常的意外人员哪是任何证据，在所有“ ？

Commander Kolstad also questions many aspects of the attack on the World Trade Center.  “How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767?  Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767?  The evidence just doesn’t add up.”指挥官也kolstad问题的许多方面的攻击对世界贸易中心“ ，如何可以一钢和混凝土建筑物倒塌后，击中一架波音767呢？没有工程师的设计，它能够顶住直接击中，从波音707 ，大约有同样的尺寸和重量的767呢？证据，只是不添加了“ 。

“Why did the second building collapse before the first one, which had been burning for 20 minutes longer after a direct hit, especially when the second one hit was just a glancing blow?  If the fire was so hot, then why were people looking out the windows and in the destroyed areas?  Why have so many members of the New York Fire Department reported seeing or hearing many ‘explosions’ before the buildings collapsed?” “为什么二号楼倒塌前，第一次，这已燃烧了20分钟后，不再直接袭击，尤其是当第二个1个安打，只是翻阅打击？如果火势，使热点，那么，为何被人看出来Windows和在被摧毁的地区，为何有这么多的成员，新的纽约消防局据报看到或听觉有许多'爆炸'之前，建筑物倒塌“ ？

Commander Kolstad summarized his frustration with the investigation and disbelief of the official account of 9/11, “If one were to act as an accident investigator, one would look at the evidence, and then construct a plausible scenario as to what led to the accident.  In this case, we were told the story and then the evidence was built to support the story.  What happened to any intelligent investigation?  Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority.  This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official ‘story’ and why I want the truth to be told.”指挥官kolstad总结了他的挫折感与调查和难以置信的官方帐户9 / 11 ， “如果一个人作为事故调查，一会研究证据，然后构建一个可能的情况下，以什么导致意外在这种情况下，告诉我们的故事，然后证据，建立了支持的故事。所发生的任何智能调查？每个问题导致的另一个问题未获任何人的权力，这是刚刚开始，作为为什么我不相信官方的'故事' ，为什么我想真相会告诉“ 。

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski     A Pentagon eye-witness and a former member of the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, US Air Force (ret), is a severe critic of the official account of 9/11.  A contributing author to the 2006 book 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, she wrote, “I believe the [9/11] Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research.”中校克伦kwiatkowski五角大楼眼证人和一名前成员的工作人员署署长国家安全局中校克伦kwiatkowski ，博士，美国空军（退休） ，是一种严重的批评官方帐户9 / 11 。贡献的作者，以2006年的图书9 / 11和美利坚帝国：知识分子的发言，她写道： “我相信[ 9 / 11 ]委员会未能深入研究的话题，另一方面，未能运用科学其严谨的评估活动领导直至并包括9 / 11 ，未能出示一可信和公正的概要发生了什么，未能充分研究，为什么发生，甚至没有包括一套无法回答的问题，为今后的研究“ 。

She continued, “It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics.  The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics.”她续说： “这是作为一个科学家，我有最麻烦与官方政府的阴谋论，主要是因为它不符合规则的概率或物理。坍塌的世界贸易中心大厦显然违反了法律的概率和物理“ 。
Col. Kwiatkowski was working in the Pentagon on 9/11 in her capacity as Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense when Flight 77 allegedly hit the Pentagon.  She wrote, “There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact.  Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner.  This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the Secretary of Defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ‘missile.’ [Secretary Rumsfeld also publicly referred to Flight 93 as the plane that was “shot down” over Pennsylvania.]上校kwiatkowski工作，在五角大楼对9 / 11在她的身份，政治军事事务主任，秘书办公室，国防部时，飞行77据称击中五角大楼，她写道： “有一个缺乏有形的碎片就相对标志的草坪，在那里我站在只需要几分钟的时间后的影响。超出了这个奇怪的缺乏客机碎片，有没有迹象显示该种损害向五角大楼结构，人们会期望从影响一个大型客机，这有形的证据，或缺乏因此也可能已明显向局长国防部[拉姆斯菲尔德] ，谁在一个不幸的失言转介到飞机的一半陷入五角大楼作为一个'导弹' [美国国防部长拉姆斯菲尔德也公开提到的93号班机作为飞机是“击落”宾夕法尼亚州。 ]

“I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. “我看到没有意义的出发点的影响-没有飞机金属碎片或货物被吹对草坪在前面的损坏建设作为浓烟所笼罩，来自五角大楼。 … [A]ll of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident. … … [一]当地雇员，我们凝视在五角大楼当天上午确实在寻找这样的碎片，但我们所期望看到并不明显。

“The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. “也是一样，对于该种损害我们所预料的。 … But I did not see this kind of damage. … …但我没有看到这种损害。 Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter.  Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.相反，正面有一个相当小的孔，不大于20英尺，直径，虽然这幌子，稍后倒塌，但仍站立， 30或40分钟，与屋顶线，其余相对直。

“The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner.  It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. “现场，在短期内，没有什么，我会预计从罢工由一个大型客机。然而，它正是人们会期望，如果导弹已经击中了五角大楼。 … More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day.” …更多信息，是当然需要有关的事件， 9 / 11和事件领导到那个可怕的一天“ 。

The improbability of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 is a major concern of these officers and a growing number of scientists, engineers and architects.  The building was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and would have been the tallest building in 33 states.  Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 pm on 9/11.  In the 6 years since 9/11, the Federal government has failed to provide any explanation for the collapse.  In addition to the failure to provide an explanation, absolutely no mention of Building 7’s collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission’s “full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.”该improbability的崩溃，世界贸易中心大厦7是一个重大的关注，这些人员和越来越多的科学家，工程师和建筑师。大楼六一〇英尺身高， 47的故事，并会一直是最高的建筑在33个国家。虽然未击中由一架飞机，它完全倒塌成一堆瓦砾，在不到7秒，在下午5点20分就9 / 11 ，在六年自从9 / 11 ，联邦政府已没有提供任何解释为崩溃。在除了未能提供解释，绝对没有提及建设7的崩溃，出现在9 / 11委员会的“充分和完全的帐户的情况下，围绕2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击” 。

Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford     Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, US Marine Corps (ret), an attack pilot with over 300 combat missions, wrote in 2007 to the Michigan Daily,  “Our government has been hijacked by means of a ‘new Pearl Harbor’ and a lot of otherwise good and decent people who are gullible enough to think that the first three steel-framed buildings in history fall down because they have some fires that the fire fighter on the scene said could be knocked down with a couple of hoses and through which people walked before they were photographed looking out the holes  where the plane hit.  One of these, Building 7, was never hit by a plane and even NIST is ashamed to advance a reason for its collapse.  And, miracle of miracles, these three buildings just happened to be leased and insured by the same guy who is on tape  saying they decided to ‘PULL’ the last one to fall.”中校谢尔顿lankford中校谢尔顿lankford ，美海军陆战队（退休） ，攻击飞行员超过300的作战任务，写在2007年到美国密歇根州日报， “我们的政府一直所劫持的手段'新明珠港'了很多，否则良好和体面的人，谁是轻信不够认为，首三个钢架建筑物在历史上倒下，因为他们有一些火灾消防战士在现场说，可撞倒与一对夫妇的软管，并通过其中的人走之前，他们拍照寻找出漏洞的地方，飞机击中。之一，其中，建设7 ，从来没有击中飞机，甚至NIST的是惭愧，提前为理由，其崩溃。和，奇迹的奇迹，这三个建筑物刚刚发生，以租用和被保险人由同一人谁是在磁带上说，他们决定把'拉'的最后一次下降“ 。
During his 20 year military career, Col. Lankford’s decorations include the Distinguished Flying Cross, and 32 awards of the Air Medal.在他20年的军事生涯中，上校lankford的装饰品，包括杰出的飞行交叉，且32奖项的空气金牌。

In a statement to this author, Col. Lankford wrote, “September 11, 2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our lifetimes.  The evidence of government complicity in the lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of evidence turned up by others that renders the official explanation impossible, may signal the end of the American experiment.  It has been used to justify all manners of measures to legalize repression at home and as a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad.  Until we demand an independent, honest, and thorough investigation and accountability for those whose action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up, our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest danger.”在一份声明中向笔者，上校lankford写道： “ 2001年9月11日似乎注定要成为分水岭，一旦我们的生活和最大的考验，为我们的民主在我们的有生之年实现这一目标。证据共谋在政府带头的后续措施事件，未作反应在这一事件中，和惊人的，缺乏任何有意义的调查之后，以及作为无视证据的出现，由他人，使官方的解释是不可能的，可能预示着年底美国的实验，它已用来证明所有方式的措施，以镇压合法化，在家里和以此为借口的表现，作为一个积极的帝国在国外。直到我们的需求，一个独立，诚实，彻底的调查和问责制，为那些行动和不采取行动，导致这些事件和封面-起来，我们的共和国和我们的宪法仍留在严重的危险“ 。

Lt. Col. Jeff Latas     Another harsh critic of the official account of 9/11 is Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, US Air Force (ret).  A former combat fighter pilot, Col. Latas is currently a commercial airline pilot.中校杰夫latas另一苛刻的批评官方帐户9 / 11是中校杰夫latas ，美国空军（退休） 。前打击战斗机飞行员，上校latas目前是商业航空公司的飞行员。

Col. Latas is a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth.  In 2007 he was interviewed by the group’s founder, commercial airline pilot, Rob Balsamo, regarding the group’s documentary video, Pandora’s Black Box, Chapter 2, Flight of American 77, which focuses on the 9/11 Commission’s account of the impact of Flight 77 at the Pentagon and discrepancies with the data from the Flight Data Recorder alleged by the NTSB to be from Flight 77.上校latas的一员，飞行员，为9 / 11真理。在2007年，他采访了该集团的创始人，商业航空公司的飞行员，抢劫balsamo ，关于集团的纪录片，影片，潘朵拉的黑盒子，第2章，飞行的美国77 ，该报告着重谈到9 / 11委员会的帐户的影响，飞行77在五角大楼和差异，与数据从飞行数据记录器据称是由ntsb是由飞行77 。
In the interview, Col. Latas said, “After I did my own analysis of it, it’s obvious that there’s discrepancies between the two stories; between the 9/11 Commission and the flight data recorder information.  And I think that’s where we really need to focus a lot of our attention to get the help that we need in order to put pressure on government agencies to actually do a real investigation of 9/11.  And not just from a security standpoint, but from even an aviation standpoint, like any accident investigation would actually help the aviators out by finding reasons for things happening.”在采访中，上校latas说， “后，我本来我自己的分析，很明显有差异，两国之间的故事;之间的9 / 11委员会和飞行数据记录器的资料。我认为奇摩那里，我们真的需要把重点放在了很多我们注意得到的帮助下，我们需要在以施加压力，政府机构，其实做一个真正的调查， 9 / 11 。而不是只从安全的角度，而是从，甚至1航空的立场，如同任何事故调查会，其实，帮助飞行员所寻找的原因，事情发生“ 。

A highly decorated fighter pilot, Col. Latas was awarded the Distinguish Flying Cross for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals.  His combat experience includes Desert Storm and four tours of duty in Northern and Southern Watch.  During his 20-year Air Force career, he also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer, as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and as President, US Air Force Accident Investigation Board.一个高度装饰战斗机飞行员，上校latas被授予区分飞两岸，为的英雄气概， 4个空军奖章， 4优良服务奖章，和9空中成就奖章，他的作战经验，包括沙漠风暴和4个旅游地点在北部和南部观赏。在他20年的空军生涯中，他还担任过五角大楼的武器的要求，主任，作为一个成员，五角大楼的四年防务评估报告，作为总统，美空军事故调查委员会。

Col. Latas concluded, “And I think that we Americans need to demand further investigation just to clarify the discrepancies that you’ve [Pilots for 9/11 Truth] found.  And I think that we need to be getting on the phone with our Congressmen and women and letting them know that we don’t accept the excuses that we’re hearing now, that we want true investigators to do a true investigation.”上校latas总结说： “我认为我们美国人的需求，需要进一步调查只是为了澄清差异，您[飞行员为9 / 11真理]发现。我认为我们需要获得在手机上与我们的国会议员和妇女，并让他们知道我们不接受的借口，我们正在听证会，现在，我们要真正的调查做一个真正的调查“ 。

Capt. Eric H. May上尉李家祥每小时5月

Commander Ted Muga指挥官泰德muga

Capt. Eric H. May, US Army (ret), is a former Army Intelligence Officer who also served as an inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team.  He is one of many signers of a petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11.  In 2005, he wrote: “As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally ’round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida.  In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril.上尉李家祥每小时5月，美国军队（退休） ，是前陆军情报官员谁也担任督察和口译为中间核力量条约队，他是一个有很多签名的一份请愿书，要求重新9 / 11 。在2005年，他写道： “作为一名前军官，我倾向后，立即911是团结'轮的颜色和保卫国家反对什么，我当时以为是一个阴险的，恶意的所有阿拉伯国家的实体所谓的基地组织。事实上，在2002年4月，我试图重新启动，我当时退休的委员会，以返回到服务我的国家在其时间的危险。 …

Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either现在我认为911事件作为教授大卫格里芬的作者，新的珍珠港事件，它的看法：作为一个问题，这意味着要么

A)  passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse … 1 ）被动参与，布什在白宫通过一种蓄意的立场回落，适当的防御程序， （如果遵循）会导致美国的航空资产，以快速识别和对抗的客运飞机的影响，世台会1和世台会二，或更糟…

B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East …” b ）积极执行一项阴谋无赖分子的政府，开始与白宫本身，在创造一个壮观的破坏，这将导致美国成为一个入侵中东… … “

Commander Ted Muga, US Navy (ret), is a Navy aviator, who, after retirement, had a second career as a commercial airline pilot for Pan-Am.指挥官泰德muga ，美国海军（退休） ，是海军飞行员，谁，退休后，进行了第二职业作为一个商业航空公司飞行员泛上午。
In a 2007 interview on the Alex Jones Show,  Commander Muga stated, “The maneuver at the Pentagon was just a tight spiral coming down out of 7,000 feet.  And a commercial aircraft, while they can in fact structurally somewhat handle that maneuver, they are very, very, very difficult.  And it would take considerable training.  In other words, commercial aircraft are designed for a particular purpose and that is for comfort and for passengers and it’s not for military maneuvers.  And while they are structurally capable of doing them, it takes some very, very talented pilots to do that.在2007年接受采访时徐家琼斯显示，指挥官muga指出， “这次演习在五角大楼，只是一个紧螺旋下降，走出七零零零英尺。和商用飞机，而他们其实可以在结构上有所处理这个动作，他们是非常，非常，非常困难，并且会采取相当的训练。换句话说，商用飞机的目的是为某一特定目的，那就是舒适和乘客和它的不是军事演习。虽然它们的结构是否有能力他们这样做，它需要一些非常，非常优秀的飞行员这样做。 … I just can’t imagine an amateur even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of that nature. … …我只是不能想象一个业余，甚至能够接近表演了机动这种性质的。
“And as far as hijacking the airplanes, once again getting back to the nature of pilots and airplanes, there is no way that a pilot would give up an airplane to hijackers. “据劫持飞机，再次回到性质的飞行员和飞机，是没有出路的一个试验，放弃一飞机劫持者。 … I mean, hell, a guy doesn’t give up a TV remote control much less a complicated 757.  And so to think that pilots would allow a plane to be taken over by a couple of 5 foot 7, 150 pound guys with a one-inch blade boxcutter is ridiculous. …我的意思是，地狱，一个人不放弃电视远程控制少得多一个复杂的757 。等认为，飞行员将使飞机将要采取的由一对夫妇5英尺7 ，一百五十英镑球员与1英寸叶片boxcutter是可笑的。

“And also in all four planes, if you remember, none of the planes ever switched on their transponder to the hijack code.  There’sa very, very simple code that you put in if you suspect that your plane is being hijacked.  It takes literally just a split-second for you to put your hand down on the center console and flip it over.  And not one of the four planes ever transponded a hijack code, which is most, most unusual. “ ，并在所有4架飞机，如果你还记得，没有飞机以往任何时候都开关就其转发给劫持代码。有非常，非常简单的程式码，您提出的在如果您怀疑自己的飞机被劫持。需从字面上来看只是一个分裂的第二次为你把你的手，对中央控制台和Flip它。而不是其中的4架飞机以往任何时候都transponded一劫持代码，这是最，最不寻常的。 …

“Commercial airplanes are very, very complex pieces of machines.  And they’re designed for two pilots up there, not just two amateur pilots, but two qualified commercial pilots up there.  And to think that you’re going to get an amateur up into the cockpit and fly, much less navigate, it to a designated target, the probability is so low, that it’s bordering on impossible.” “商用飞机是非常，非常复杂件的机器。他们正在设计的两名飞行员在那里，不只是两个业余飞行员，但有两个符合条件的商业飞行员在那里。并认为您将会获得一个业余了进入驾驶舱及苍蝇，更遑论浏览，到指定的目标，概率是如此之低，它的邻国就不可能的“ 。

Col. George Nelson上校乔治纳尔逊

“In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident,” wrote Col. George Nelson, MBA, US Air Force (ret), a former US Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. “在我所有的年直接和间接参与，我从来没有亲眼目睹，也没有听说过某型飞机的损失，而飞机残骸被访问，阻止调查人员从找到足够的确凿证据，以查明积极的牌子，型号，和具体的登记号码的飞机-在大多数情况下，精确的事故原因，写道： “上校乔治纳尔逊，工商管理硕士学位，美国空军（退休） ，美国前空军飞机事故调查员和飞机零件的权力。

“The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.  On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view,” continued Col. Nelson, a graduate of the US Air Force War College and a 34-year Air Force veteran. “政府称， 4宽体客机坠毁于当天上午01年9月11日，在导致死亡的超过3000人，但没有一件很难飞机的证据，已制作完成，在试图找出任何积极的四架飞机。相反，它似乎只是所有可能的证据，是故意保持隐藏的公众认为， “继续上校纳尔逊，毕业于美国空军战争学院和一个34岁的空军退伍军人。
“With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged.  Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. “所有证据现成在五角大楼坠机地点，任何不抱偏见的理性的调查可能只能得出这样的结论认为，这架波音757客机没有飞行到五角大楼指控。同样，与所有的证据，可于宾夕法尼亚州的坠机地点，这是最令人怀疑一客机，造成明显的孔在地面和肯定不是架波音757客机的指控。 …

“As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.” “痛苦和痛心的是，作为无辜生命的损失和挥之不去的健康问题更多的成千上万，最麻烦和恶梦般的概率仍然有这么多的美国人似乎不应该牵涉在最令人发指的阴谋，在我们国家的历史” 。

Maj. John M. Newman, PhD少校约翰米纽曼，博士

Capt. Omar Pradhan上尉奥马尔普拉丹

Col. Ronald D. Ray     Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, US Army (ret), is the former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency.  In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing, he said, “It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report…上校夏佳理四线少校约翰米纽曼，博士，美国军队（退休） ，是前执行主任助理国家安全局。在证词之前， 2005年美国国会的简报，他说： “它属于我今天上午提请你注意的故事赛义德谢赫，其全名是艾哈迈德奥马尔赛义德谢赫，和他的惊人上升，电力在盖达组织，他的关键作用，在9 / 11 ，这是完全，彻底，从失踪9 / 11委员会的报告…

“The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community’s performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report. “ 9 / 11委员会负责研究美国情报和执法界的表现非常详细的， （也许不是那么多伟大的细节，但他们没有） ，忽略了包括社会的表现，在周攻击事件之后，来决定谁是负责对他们来说，不是一个闭口不谈，在该报告。

“The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered. “该报告并进行讨论，美国立即反应，但立即进行调查，是从来没有解决，任何人谁仔细研究了9.11调查知道，第一次突破，来两个星期，到调查时，汇款从阿拉伯联合酋长国向劫机者被揭发。

“Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda’s finance chief.  For this reason alone you have to ask why the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief’s role as the 9/11 paymaster.” “此外，如果您有研究调查，你知道是没有争议的同时，调查人员可能有挣扎与身份的paymaster ，他们清楚的一件事，他是盖达组织的财务行政。基于这个原因，单是你要问，为什么9 / 11委员会的报告没有提到财务行政的角色，作为9 / 11 paymaster “ 。

Capt. Omar Pradhan, US Air Force, is a former AWACS command pilot and Flight Instructor at the US Air Force Academy.  In a 2007 statement to this author, Capt. Pradhan wrote, “As a proud American, as a distinguished USAF E-3 AWACS Aircraft Commander (with 350+ hours of combat time logged over Afghanistan and Iraq), and as a former US Air Force Academy Flight Instructor, I warmly endorse the professional inquiry and pursuit of comprehensive truth sought by the Pilots for 911 Truth organization and the PatriotsQuestion911 website.”上尉奥马尔普拉丹，美国空军，是前预警指挥飞行员和飞行教官在美空军学院，在2007年声明，此作者，上尉普拉丹写道： “作为一个值得骄傲的美国，作为一个杰出的美国空军电子3预警飞机的指挥官（ 350 +小时的战斗时间记录超过阿富汗和伊拉克） ，并作为美国前空军学院的飞行教员，我热烈赞同的专业调查和追求真理，寻求全面的，由飞行员为911真相组织和该patriotsquestion911网站“ 。

Another senior officer questioning the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ronald D. Ray, US Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan.  A highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart), he was appointed by President George HW Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 – 1994), and the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces.  He was Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the US Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, DC (1990 – 1994).另一高级官员质疑官方帐户9 / 11是上校夏佳理四线，美海军陆战队（退休） ，副助理国务卿下的防卫总统里根。高度装饰越战老兵（ 2银星，铜星和一紫心勋章） ，他被任命为总统乔治HW布什供职于美国战役纪念碑委员会（ 1990年-1 994年） ，和1 992年的总统委员会就指派妇女在武装部队中，他是军事历史学家和副主任外勤业务，为美军海军陆战队的历史中心，华盛顿哥伦比亚特区（ 1990年-1 994年） 。

In an interview on Alex Jones’ radio show on June 30, 2006, Col. Ray described the official account of 9/11 as “the dog that doesn’t hunt”, meaning it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.  In response to Alex Jones’ question, “Is it safe to say or is the statement accurate that you smell something rotten in the state of Denmark when it comes to 9/11?”  Col. Ray replied,“I’m astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that that’s accurate.  That’s true.”在接受采访时徐家琼斯的电台节目于6月30日， 2006年，上校射线所描述的官方帐户9 / 11 “狗不狩猎” ，意思是它没有站起来，以审议。在回应徐家琼斯的问题， “是否安全，或说是准确的声明说，你的香水味道的东西烂在该国的丹麦，当谈到9 / 11 ” ？上校射线回答说： “我很震惊，该阴谋论先进由政府当局可在事实上，真实的证据，似乎并不表明，这是准确的。认为的真实“ 。
“After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government.  It is now time to take our country back,” wrote Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, US Air Force (ret), in a statement to this author. “后， 4 +多年的研究，自2002年退休，我百分之百确信，袭击2001年9月11日被有计划，有组织，并承诺由叛逆肇事者已经渗透到了最高级别的，我们的政府，这是现在是时候我们的国家回到写道， “中校家伙第razer ，质谱，美空军（退休） ，在一份声明中向笔者。

A retired fighter pilot, Col. Razer served as an instructor at the US Air Force Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program and flew combat missions over Iraq.  He continued, “The ‘collapse’ of WTC Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned.  There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break.  It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned.  Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein’s video taped confession in which he states ‘they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse.’已退休的战斗机飞行员，上校razer担任讲师，美国空军战斗机武器学校和北约的战术领导的计划和飞行作战任务，在伊拉克上空。他续称， “ '崩溃'的世贸中心大楼7显示，毫无疑问认为摧毁预先计划。是根本不存在的方式，拆除47层大楼（消防）超过一喝咖啡休息，这也是不可能的报告，该大厦的崩溃，才发生了，作为BBC新闻做，除非这是预先计划，进一步严厉的证据是拉里西尔弗斯坦的视频录制的供认，在他国，他们作出这一决定退出[世贸中心7 ] ，我们观看了楼宇倒塌。

“We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail.  Those of us in the military took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’.  Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it,” he concluded. “我们不能让追求正义失败。我们这些在军事上采取了宣誓，支持和保卫美国宪法反对一切敌人，外国和国内' 。只因为我们已经退休，没有作出这样的宣誓无效，所以这不仅是我们的责任，这是我们的责任，揭露真正的肇事者9 / 11 ，并把他们绳之以法，不管是何等的难，需要多久才能，或有多少我们要遭受这样做“ ，他得出的结论。

Maj. Scott Ritter少校斯科特里特

Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD少校道格拉斯rokke ，博士

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer中校安东尼shaffer

Maj. Scott Ritter, US Marine Corps, is a former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer who also served as Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991 - 1998.  In 2005, he said: “I, like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case.”少校斯科特里特，美海军陆战队，是一名前海军陆战队情报官员谁也担任首席武器检查员，为联合国特别委员会在伊拉克的1991 -1 998年在2 005年，他说： “我，其他人一样，感到沮丧由9 / 11委员会的报告中，缺乏透明度，对部分美国政府两方面来看，行政部门和立法部门，当谈到把放在桌上的所有事实众所周知9 / 11案件警示录“ 。

Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD, US Army (ret), former Director of the US Army Depleted Uranium Project and 30-year veteran, had this to say about the explosion at the Pentagon on 9/11, “When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile.  And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”少校道格拉斯rokke ，博士，美国军队（退休） ，前主任，美国军队的贫化铀计划和30年的老将，曾这样说，爆炸大约在五角大楼9 / 11 ， “当你看到整个thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile.  And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”

The 9/11 Commission Report asserts that only three of the alleged hijackers were known to US intelligence agencies prior to 9/11: Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, and Khalid al-Mihdar.  There is no mention in the Report that the names and photographs of alleged hijacker Marwan al-Shehhi and alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been identified by the Department of Defense anti-terrorist program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to 9/11 and that they were known to be affiliates of al-Qaida.  Able Danger also identified Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdar.

In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee in 2006, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, US Army Reserve, former Chief of the Army’s Controlled HUMINT (Human Intelligence) Program, overseeing Army Intelligence and Security Command’s global controlled HUMINT efforts, stated: “[B]asic law enforcement investigative techniques, with 21st Century data mining and analytical tools … resulted in the establishment of a new form of intelligence collection – and the identification of Mohammed Atta and several other of the 9-11 terrorists as having links to Al Qaeda leadership a full year in advance of the attacks. …

“After contact by two separate members of the ABLE DANGER team, … the 9-11 [Commission] staff refused to perform any in-depth review or investigation of the issues that were identified to them. … It was their job to do a thorough investigation of these claims – to not simply dismiss them based on what many now believe was a ‘preconceived’ conclusion to the 9-11 story they wished to tell. … I consider this a failure of the 9-11 staff – a failure that the 9-11 Commissioners themselves were victimized by – and continue to have perpetrated on them by the staff as is evidenced by their recent, groundless conclusion that ABLE DANGER’s findings were ‘urban legend’.”
A 23-year military intelligence veteran, Col. Shaffer was recently awarded the Bronze Star for bravery in Afghanistan.  In a 2005 interview on Fox News, Col Shaffer asked, “Why did this operation, which was created in ‘99 to target Al Qaeda globally, offensively, why was that turned off in the Spring of 2001, four months before we were attacked?  I can’t answer that, either.  I can tell you I was ordered out of the operation directly by a two-star general.”

Supporting Col. Shaffer’s statement, Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, US Navy, currently Commanding Officer of the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf and former head of the Able Danger data mining program, stated in 2005: “I will not discuss this outside of my chain of command.  I have briefed the Department of the Army, the Special Operations Command and the office of (Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence) Dr. Cambone as well as the 9/11 Commission.  My story has remained consistent.  Atta was identified by Able Danger in January/February 2000.” Capt. Phillpott is a US Naval Academy graduate, who during his 23 years of Navy service has been awarded the Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, three Meritorious Service Medals, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, two Navy Commendation Medals, and the Navy Achievement Medal.

Joel Skousen

Gen. Albert Stubblebine     Former US Marine Corps fighter pilot Joel M. Skousen also questions the official account of 9/11.  After his military service, Mr. Skousen served as Chairman of the Conservative National Committee in Washington DC and Executive Editor of Conservative Digest.

“In the March 2005 issue, PM [Popular Mechanics] magazine singled out 16 issues or claims of the 9/11 skeptics that point to government collusion and systematically attempted to debunk each one.  Of the 16, most missed the mark and almost half were straw men arguments - either ridiculous arguments that few conspiracists believed or restatements of the arguments that were highly distorted so as to make them look weaker than they really were. …

“I am one of those who claim there are factual arguments pointing to conspiracy, and that truth is not served by taking cheap shots at those who see gaping flaws in the government story … There is significant evidence that the aircraft impacts did not cause the collapse [of the Twin Towers] …

The issues of the penetration hole [at the Pentagon] and the lack of large pieces of debris simply do not jive with the official story, but they are explainable if you include the parking lot video evidence that shows a huge white explosion at impact.  This cannot happen with an aircraft laden only with fuel.  It can only happen in the presence of high explosives.”

Major General Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret), former Commanding General of US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), is a strong critic of the official account of 9/11.  In a 2006 video documentary he said, “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War.  I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job.  I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon.  And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’.  So what did hit the Pentagon?  What hit it?  Where is it?  What’s going on?”

During his 32-year Army career, Gen. Stubblebine also commanded the US Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the US Army’s Intelligence School and Center.  Gen. Stubblebine is one of the inductees into the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
“There is a well-organized cover-up of the events of 11 Sep 2001.  The 9/11 Commission was a white-washed farce.  There is evidence that US Government officials had advance knowledge of and are probably implicated in the events of 9/11,” wrote retired military physician, Col. James R. Uhl, MD, US Army (ret), in a statement to this author.

“A huge body of physical evidence has been ignored, suppressed, and ridiculed by the media and by our Government.  Why did WTC 7 collapse?  It was never hit by an airplane and was apparently brought down by explosives.  How could Al-Qaida terrorists have had access and time to plant bombs in a top secret installation?  Why did the 9/11 Commission fail to seek the reason for the WTC 7 collapse?” continued Col. Uhl, a 38-year Army veteran, who served in several theaters of operations, from Viet Nam through Iraq.

Capt. Russ Wittenberg     Capt. Russ Wittenberg, US Air Force, is a former US Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions and a retired commercial pilot, who flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years.

According to Capt. Wittenberg, “The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total BS, plain and simple.

In the 2007 documentary video, 9/11 Ripple Effect,he said “I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.
“I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist, to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding its design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s.  And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky.  I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.” Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon, Capt. Wittenberg said, ”The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.  The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous … It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane.  And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building.  There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77.  We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”

Col. Ann Wright

Capt. Gregory Zeigler     Another senior officer questioning the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ann Wright, US Army (ret), who said in a 2007 interview with Richard Greene on the Air America Radio Network, “It’s incredible some of these things that still are unanswered.  The 9/11 Report — that was totally inadequate.  I mean the questions that anybody has after reading that.”

Col. Wright is one of three US State Department officials to publicly resign in direct protest of the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003.  She served for 13 years on active duty and 16 additional years on reserve duty in the US Army.  She joined the Foreign Service in 1987 and served for 16 years as a US Diplomat.  She served as Deputy Chief of Mission of US Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan and she helped reopen the US Embassy in Kabul in December, 2001.

She continued in her interview: “How could our national intelligence and defense operations be so inept that they could not communicate; that they could not scramble jets; that they could not take defensive action?  And I totally agree.  I always thought the Pentagon had all sorts of air defense sort of equipment around it; that they could take out anything that was coming at it.  And for a plane to be able to just fly low right over Washington and slam into that thing is just — I mean, you still just shake your head.  How in the world could that happen?”

Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, is a former US Army Intelligence Officer.  In a 2006 statement to this author, Capt. Zeigler wrote, “I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false.  That was when I realized that the perpetrators had made a colossal blunder in collapsing the South Tower first, rather than the North Tower, which had been hit more directly and earlier.

“Other anomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers’ names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC 1 and 2 and WTC 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon, the impossibility of ordinary cell phone (as opposed to Airfone) calls being made consistently from passenger aircraft at cruising altitude, etc., etc., etc.”

Shortly after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, a group of over 100 prominent Americans signed a petition urging Congress to immediately reinvestigate 9/11.  In addition to two former senior CIA officials and several US State Department veterans, the signers included Lt. Col. Robert Bowman and Capt. Eric H. May, both mentioned above.

The petition stated, in part, “We want truthful answers to questions such as:

1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

2. 2 。 Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

3. 3 。 Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

4. Why hasn’ta single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

5. Why haven’t authorities in the US and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”

These questions and many others still remain unanswered three years after the petition was submitted and six years after the terrible events of 9/11.  As the statements of these twenty-five former US military officers demonstrate, the need for a new thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans.  It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world.

See More: USA News

Have Your Say: 25 USA Military Officers Challenge Official 9/11 Account
Please note, only selected comments will be published.

Or discuss this report in our our new forums

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 邮件（不会被公布） （必填）

Website 网站

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 24th, 2008 at 9:39 am and is filed under 9/11 Truth , War & Terrorism News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...载入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS

Activism & Protest News | Business News | Civil & Human Rights News | Environmental News | Media News | Globalisation News | Web Development News

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art艺术 BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs药物 Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda宣传 RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version

About | DVD Store | Opinion | Reviews | Special Guests | Webmasters