25 USA Military Officers Challenge Official 9/11 Account 25 E.U.A. oficiais militares Challenge Oficial 9 / 11 Conta
Pakistan Daily Paquistão Daily | Twenty-five former US military officers have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. They include former commander of US Army Intelligence, Major General Albert Stubblebine, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Col. Ronald D. Ray, two former staff members of the Director of the National Security Agency; Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, and Major John M. Newman, PhD, and many others. They are among the rapidly growing number of military and intelligence service veterans, scientists, engineers, and architects challenging the government’s story. The officers’ statements appear below, listed alphabetically. | Vinte e cinco ex-oficiais militares E.U. ter criticado severamente o funcionário conta de 9 / 11 e apelou a um novo inquérito. Incluem antigo comandante do Exército E.U. Intelligence, Major-General Albert Stubblebine, ex-Vice-Secretário Adjunto da Defesa, coronel Ronald D . Ray, dois antigos membros do pessoal do director da Agência de Segurança Nacional; Tenente Coronel Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, John Major e M. Newman, PhD, e muitos outros. Eles estão entre o rápido crescimento do número de militares e de inteligência de serviço veteranos, cientistas, engenheiros, arquitetos e desafiando o governo da história. Os oficiais "declarações aparecem abaixo, listados por ordem alfabética.
Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD “A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible,” said Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, US Air Force (ret). Tenente Coronel Robert Bowman, PhD "Muitos destes pedaços de informação, em conjunto, provar que a história oficial, o funcionário teoria da conspiração 9 / 11 é um monte de hogwash. É impossível", disse o Tenente Coronel . Robert Bowman, PhD, E.U. Força Aérea (ret). With doctoral degrees in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Col. Bowman served as Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Com doutoramento em Engenharia Aeronáutica e Nuclear, Col. Bowman atuou como Diretor de Programas de Desenvolvimento Espacial Avançada sob Presidentes Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter.
“There’sa second group of facts having to do with the cover up,” continued Col. Bowman. “Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible. Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? When you take those three things together, I think the case is pretty clear that it’s highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.” "Existe um segundo grupo de factos tendo a ver com a tampa para cima," continuou coronel Bowman. "Em conjunto, estas coisas provar que níveis elevados de nosso governo nós não queremos saber o que aconteceu e que é responsável. Quem obtida a partir de 9 / 11? Quem cobertas até informações cruciais sobre o 9 / 11? Eo que colocar para fora manifestamente falsas notícias sobre a 9 / 11, em primeiro lugar? Quando você tomar essas três coisas juntas, penso que o caso é muito claro que ele 'S indivíduos altamente colocados na administração em todas as estradas passando por Dick Cheney. "
Regarding the failure of NORAD to intercept the four hijacked planes on 9/11, Col. Bowman said, “I’m an old interceptor pilot. I know the drill. I’ve done it. I know how long it takes. I know the rules. No que diz respeito ao fracasso da NORAD para interceptar os quatro aviões sequestrados em 9 / 11, Col. Bowman disse: "Eu sou um velho interceptador piloto. Sei que a broca. Eu fiz isso. Sei quanto tempo leva. Sei as regras. … Critics of the government story on 9/11 have said: ‘Well, they knew about this, and they did nothing’. That’s not true. If our government had done nothing that day and let normal procedure be followed, those planes, wherever they were, would have been intercepted, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.” … Críticos do governo história em 9 / 11 que disse: 'Bem, eles sabiam sobre o assunto, e eles não fizeram nada ". Isso não é verdade. Se o nosso governo tinha feito nada nesse dia e deixar ser seguido o procedimento normal, os aviões , Onde quer que fosse, teria sido interceptado, as Torres Gémeas seriam ainda de pé e de milhares de mortos americanos ainda estaria vivo. "
During his 22-year Air Force career, Col. Bowman also served as the Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the US Air Force Institute of Technology. He also flew over 100 combat missions in Viet Nam as a fighter pilot. Durante seus 22 anos de carreira da Força Aérea, coronel Bowman também serviu como o chefe do Departamento de Engenharia Aeronáutica e os E.U. Assistant Dean no Air Force Institute of Technology. Ele também voou mais de 100 missões na luta contra o Vietname como um lutador piloto.
Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom Former US Air Force pilot Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom wrote in a 2007 statement to this author, “When 9/11 occurred I bought the entire government and mainstream media story line. I was a lifelong conservative Republican that voted for Bush/Cheney, twice. Curiosity about JFK’s death, after a late night TV re-run of Oliver Stone’s movie, got me started researching and digging for the truth about his assassins. Tenente Jeff Dahlstrom E.U. Ex-piloto da Força Aérea Tenente Jeff Dahlstrom escreveu em 2007 uma declaração a este autor, "Quando 9 / 11 ocorreram eu comprei a todo o governo e os principais media história linha. Eu era um conservador vida republicana que votou a favor de Bush / Cheney, por duas vezes. Curiosidade sobre a morte de JFK, depois de uma noite TV re-executar o filme de Oliver Stone's, got me pesquisando e começou a cavar a verdade sobre seus assassinos.
“My research led me to a much more important and timely question: the mystery of what really did happen on 9/11. Everything that seemed real, turned out to be false. The US government and the news media, once again, were lying to the world about the real terrorists and the public murder of 2,972 innocents on 9/11. "Minha investigação levou-me a uma muito mais importante e oportuna questão: o mistério do que realmente aconteceu em 9 / 11. Tudo o que parecia real, viria a revelar-se falsas. E.U. O governo e da mídia, mais uma vez, estavam mentindo para o mundo sobre os verdadeiros terroristas e os assassinatos de cidadãos inocentes 2972 em 9 / 11.
“The ‘Patriot Act’ was actually written prior to 9/11 with the intention of destroying the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. It was passed by Congress, based upon the government’s myth of 9/11, which was in reality a staged hoax. 9/11 was scripted and executed by rogue elements of the military, FAA, intelligence, and private contractors working for the US government. "O" Patriot Act "foi na verdade escrito antes de 9 / 11, com a intenção de destruir os E.U. Constituição e Bill of Rights. Foi aprovada pelo Congresso, tendo por base o governo do mito de 9 / 11, que era na realidade um faseados hoax. 9 / 11 estava cheia e executadas pelos desonestos elementos das forças militares, FAA, inteligência, e contratantes privados a trabalhar para os E.U. governo.
“In addition to severely curtailing fundamental rights of Americans, the 9/11 crime was then used by this administration, the one I originally voted for and supported, to justify waging two preemptive wars (and most likely a third war), killing over 4,500 American soldiers, and killing over one million innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. "Além de reduzir severamente os direitos fundamentais dos americanos, o 9 / 11 crime foi então utilizada por esta administração, aquele que eu inicialmente votado a favor e apoiou, para justificar dois travam guerras preempção (e muito provavelmente de uma terceira guerra), matando mais de 4500 Soldados americanos, e matando mais de um milhão de inocentes afegãos e iraquianos.
“It was all premeditated. Treason, a false flag military operation, and betrayal of the trust of the American people were committed on 9/11 by the highest levels of the US government and not one person responsible for the crimes, or the cover-up, has been held accountable for the last six years. "Foi tudo premeditado. Traição, uma falsa bandeira operação militar, e traição da confiança do povo norte-americano foram cometidos em 9 / 11 com os mais elevados níveis de governo e os E.U. não uma pessoa responsável pelos crimes, ou a capa - up, foi considerada responsável pelos últimos seis anos.
“After reading fifteen well-researched books, studying eight or nine DVD documentaries, and devoting months of personal research and investigation, I have arrived at one ultimate conclusion: The American government and the US Constitution have been hijacked and subverted by a group of criminals that today are the real terrorists. They are in control of the US government and they have all violated their oaths of office and committed treason against their own citizens.” "Depois de ler bem-pesquisou quinze livros, estudando oito ou nove documentários DVD, e dedicando meses de pessoal de investigação e inquérito, que cheguei a uma conclusão definitiva: O governo americano e os E.U. Constituição ter sido assaltado e subvertido por um grupo de criminosos que hoje são os verdadeiros terroristas. São os E.U. no controle do governo e de terem violado todos os seus juramentos de escritório e de traição cometida contra os seus próprios cidadãos. "
Capt. Daniel Davis Capt. Daniel Davis is a former US Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. After his military service, Capt. Davis served for 15 years as a Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division and then devoted an additional 15 years as founder and CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company. Capitão Daniel Davis Capitão Daniel Davis é um antigo E.U. Army Air Defense Officer e NORAD Tac director. Após o serviço militar, Capitão Davis serviu durante 15 anos como Gerente Sênior Turbina a General Electric (jato) Mecanismo de Divisão e, em seguida, dedicou um adicional 15 anos como fundador e CEO da Turbina Technology Services Corp, uma turbina (motor a jacto) empresa de serviços e manutenção.
In a statement to this author, Capt. Davis wrote, “As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.” Em uma declaração a este autor, Capitão Davis escreveu, "Como antigo General Electric Turbina e gerente de engenharia especializada e, em seguida, CEO de uma empresa de engenharia turbina, posso garantir que nenhum dos alta tecnologia e alta temperatura liga a qualquer um dos motores quatro aviões que caiu em 9 / 11 seria completamente destruído, queimado, esmagadas ou derretido, de qualquer acidente ou incêndio. naufragaram, sim, mas não destruída. Onde estão os de todos os motores, especialmente no Pentágono? Se jato alimentado por avião caiu 9 / 11, os motores, além de asas e cauda montagem, seria lá. "
Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam, Capt. Davis also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Decorado com o Bronze Star e os Soldados medalha de bravura e de fogo sob a Purple Heart para danos corporais sofridos em Viet Nam, Capitão Davis também serviu no exército como Nike Air Command Defesa Antimíssil Bateria Controle Officer para a Defesa Área Chicago-Milwaukee.
Capt. Davis continued, “Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there’s no way all four of them could! Capitão Davis continuou, "Além disso, na minha experiência como um oficial em NORAD Tática como um director para o Chicago-Milwaukee Defesa Aérea e como um curso-piloto privado, não há nenhuma maneira que um avião em vôo instrumento planos (todos os voos comerciais são IFR) não seria interceptado quando se desviar do seu plano de voo, desligar os seus transponders, ou interromper a comunicação com controlo do tráfego aéreo. Não pode ser! Com muito má sorte, poderia talvez um talão por, mas não há nenhuma maneira todos os quatro um deles poderia!
“Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is difficult for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled ‘terrorists’. Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a ‘Conspiracy Theory’ does not change the truth. It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the State’.” "Por fim, debruçar-se sobre a colina e rodovia e em quebrar o Pentágono direita na parede / chão interface é difícil até mesmo para um único motor de avião pequeno lento e não há caminho para um 757. Talvez o melhor piloto no mundo poderia conseguir isso, mas não estes trabalhadores não qualificados "terroristas". Tentativas de fatos obscuros, chamando-lhes uma "teoria conspiratória" não muda a verdade. Parece, "Algo está podre no Estado". "
Major Jon I. Fox is a former US Marine Corps fighter pilot and a retired commercial airline pilot for Continental Airlines with a 35-year commercial aviation career. In 2007, in support of the Architects and Engineers[3] petition to reinvestigate 9/11, he wrote, “On hearing the military (NORAD/NEAD) excuses for no intercepts on 9/11/2001, I knew from personal experience that they were lying. I then began re-checking other evidence and found mostly more lies from the ‘official spokesmen’. Jet fuel fires at atmospheric pressure do not get hot enough to weaken steel. Structures do not collapse through themselves in free fall time with only gravity as the powering force.” Major Jon I. Fox é um antigo combatente E.U. Marine Corps-piloto e de um aposentado comerciais para a companhia aérea Continental Airlines-piloto com 35 anos de uma carreira na aviação comercial. Em 2007, em apoio dos arquitetos e engenheiros [3] petição ao reinvestigate 9 / 11 , Ele escreveu, "Ao ouvir os militares (NORAD / NEAD) desculpas para não intercepta em 9/11/2001, a partir de uma experiência pessoal que eu sabia que eles estavam mentindo. Eu então começou a re-verificar outros elementos de prova e se sobretudo a partir da mais mentiras "Interlocutores oficiais". Combustível Jet incêndios à pressão atmosférica não esquentar o suficiente para enfraquecer aço. Estruturas não através de si próprios colapso em queda livre com o tempo só gravidade como a alimentação de força. "
Commander Ralph Kolstad Retired US Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot Commander Ralph Kolstad started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event. In a statement to this author, he wrote, “It just didn’t make any sense to me,” he said. And now six years after 9/11 he says, “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.” Comandante Ralph Kolstad E.U. aposentado da Marinha "Top Gun" Comandante-piloto Ralph Kolstad começou a pôr em causa a conta oficial do 9 / 11 nos dias do evento. Em uma declaração a este autor, ele escreveu, "É só não faz qualquer sentido para mim ", Disse ele. E agora, seis anos após 9 / 11, diz ele," Quando um começa usando sua própria mente, e não o que era um dito, há muito pouco a acreditar na história oficial. "
Commander Kolstad was a top-rated fighter pilot during his 20-year Navy career. Early in his career, he was accorded the honor of being selected to participate in the Navy’s ‘Top Gun’ air combat school, officially known as the US Navy Fighter Weapons School. The Tom Cruise movie “Top Gun” reflects the experience of the young Navy pilots at the school. Eleven years later, Commander Kolstad was further honored by being selected to become a ‘Top Gun’ adversary instructor. Comandante Kolstad foi um lutador de alta-piloto durante a sua carreira de 20 anos Navy. Precoce em sua carreira, ele foi conferida a honra de ser selecionado para participar da Marinha do "Top Gun" combate aéreo escola, oficialmente conhecido como os E.U. Navy Fighter Armas Escola. Tom Cruise O filme "Top Gun" reflecte a experiência dos jovens pilotos da Marinha na escola. Onze anos mais tarde, Comandante Kolstad foi ainda homenageado por ser seleccionados para se tornar um "Top Gun" adversário instrutor.
Commander Kolstad had a second career after his 20 years of Navy active and reserve service and served as a commercial airline pilot for 27 years, flying for American Airlines and other domestic and international careers. Comandante Kolstad tinha uma segunda carreira após 20 anos de sua Marinha ativa e reserva de serviços e serviu como uma companhia aérea comercial piloto para 27 anos, voando para a American Airlines e outras carreiras internacionais e domésticos. He flew Boeing 727, 757 and 767, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and Fokker F-100 airliners. Ele voou Boeing 727, 757 e 767, McDonnell Douglas MD-80, e Fokker F-100 aviões. He has flown a total of over 23,000 hours in his career. Ele tem voado um total de mais de 23000 horas, em sua carreira.
Commander Kolstad is especially critical of the account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon. He says, “At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying. I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757’s and 767’s and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described.” Comandante Kolstad é especialmente crítico em relação à conta da American Airlines Flight 77, que supostamente caiu no Pentágono. Diz ele: "No Pentágono, o piloto do Boeing 757 fez bastante uma proeza de voar. Tenho 6000 horas de vôo em tempo Boeing 757's e 767's, e eu não poderia ter voado o caminho que o voo foi descrito caminho. "
Commander Kolstad adds, “I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft. I could not have done what these beginners did. Something stinks to high heaven!” Comandante Kolstad acrescenta, "eu também foi um lutador piloto da Marinha e da Air Combat Instrutor e têm experiência voar baixa altitude, aviões de alta velocidade. Eu não poderia ter feito o que fez estes novatos. Algo tanta que até brada aos céus!"
He points to the physical evidence at the Pentagon impact site and asks in exasperation, “Where is the damage to the wall of the Pentagon from the wings? Where are the big pieces that always break away in an accident? Where is all the luggage? Where are the miles and miles of wire, cable, and lines that are part and parcel of any large aircraft? Where are the steel engine parts? Where is the steel landing gear? Where is the tail section that would have broken into large pieces?” Ele aponta para a evidência física no Pentágono impacto local e pede em exasperation, "Onde está o prejuízo para a parede do Pentágono a partir da asas? Onde estão as grandes peças que sempre romper em um acidente? Onde é que está toda a bagagem? Onde é que estão a milhas e milhas de fios, cabos, linhas e que são parte integrante de qualquer grande aeronave? Onde estão as peças do motor de aço? Onde está o desembarque de aço artes? Onde está o rabo seção que teria quebrado em pedaços grandes? "
But no major element of the official account of 9/11 is spared from Commander Kolstad’s criticism. Regarding the alleged impact site of United Airlines Flight 93 near Shanksville, PA, he asks, “Where is any of the wreckage? Of all the pictures I have seen, there is only a hole! Where is any piece of a crashed airplane? Why was the area cordoned off, and no inspection allowed by the normal accident personnel? Where is any evidence at all?” Mas nenhum elemento fundamental da conta oficial do 9 / 11 é poupado de Kolstad Comandante da crítica. Quanto ao alegado impacto local da United Airlines Flight 93 perto de Shanksville, PA, pergunta ele, "Onde é que nenhum dos destroços? De todos os imagens que já vi, só existe um buraco! Onde é que qualquer peça de um avião caiu? Por que a área foi isolada, e não permitidos pela inspecção normal acidente pessoal? Onde é que está todo em todas as provas? "
Commander Kolstad also questions many aspects of the attack on the World Trade Center. “How could a steel and concrete building collapse after being hit by a Boeing 767? Didn’t the engineers design it to withstand a direct hit from a Boeing 707, approximately the same size and weight of the 767? The evidence just doesn’t add up.” Comandante Kolstad perguntas também muitos aspectos do atentado ao World Trade Center. "Como poderia um edifício de aço e betão colapso após ser atropelado por um Boeing 767? Será que os engenheiros de projeto não é resistir a um acerto direto de um Boeing 707, aproximadamente o mesmo tamanho e peso dos 767? As provas apenas não batem certo. "
“Why did the second building collapse before the first one, which had been burning for 20 minutes longer after a direct hit, especially when the second one hit was just a glancing blow? If the fire was so hot, then why were people looking out the windows and in the destroyed areas? Why have so many members of the New York Fire Department reported seeing or hearing many ‘explosions’ before the buildings collapsed?” "Por que o segundo prédio antes do primeiro um colapso, que tinha sido queima durante 20 minutos depois de um longo diretamente atingidas, especialmente quando o segundo foi um hit apenas um golpe glancing? Se o fogo era tão quente, então porque as pessoas estavam olhando para fora as janelas e nas áreas destruídas? Por que tantos membros do New York Fire Department afirmavam ter visto ou ouvido muitas "explosões" antes do colapso edifícios? "
Commander Kolstad summarized his frustration with the investigation and disbelief of the official account of 9/11, “If one were to act as an accident investigator, one would look at the evidence, and then construct a plausible scenario as to what led to the accident. In this case, we were told the story and then the evidence was built to support the story. What happened to any intelligent investigation? Every question leads to another question that has not been answered by anyone in authority. This is just the beginning as to why I don’t believe the official ‘story’ and why I want the truth to be told.” Comandante Kolstad resumiu sua frustração com o inquérito oficial ea descrença da conta de 9 / 11, "Se foi um acidente de agir como um investigador, seria um olhar para os elementos de prova e, em seguida, construir um cenário plausível, como o que levou ao acidente . Neste caso, foi-nos dito a história e, em seguida, o depoimento foi construído para suportar a história. O que aconteceu com qualquer investigação inteligente? Cada questão leva a outra pergunta que não foi respondida por ninguém na autoridade. Este é apenas o começo como a razão pela qual eu não acredito que o funcionário "história" e por isso gostaria de ser dito a verdade. "
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski A Pentagon eye-witness and a former member of the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency, Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, US Air Force (ret), is a severe critic of the official account of 9/11. A contributing author to the 2006 book 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, she wrote, “I believe the [9/11] Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research.” Tenente Coronel Karen Kwiatkowski Pentágono Uma testemunha ocular-e um antigo membro do pessoal do director da Agência de Segurança Nacional, Tenente Coronel Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, E.U. Força Aérea (ret), é um crítico severo do funcionário conta de 9 / 11. Um autor contribuindo para 2006 o livro 9 / 11 e de Império Americano: Intelectuais Speak Out, ela escreveu, "Eu acredito que o [9 / 11] Comissão não conseguiu analisar profundamente o assunto em mãos, deixou de aplicar científica rigor a sua avaliação dos acontecimentos que conduziram até, e incluindo 9 / 11, não conseguiram produzir um believable e imparcial resumo do que aconteceu, falhou completamente a analisar por que razão isso aconteceu, e ainda não conseguiram incluir uma série de perguntas sem resposta para futuras pesquisas. "
She continued, “It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics.” Ela continuou, "É como um cientista que tenho a maior parte dos problemas com a teoria da conspiração oficiais do governo, principalmente porque não satisfazem as regras de probabilidade ou física. Os colapsos do World Trade Center edifícios claramente viola as leis da probabilidade e física. "
Col. Kwiatkowski was working in the Pentagon on 9/11 in her capacity as Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense when Flight 77 allegedly hit the Pentagon. She wrote, “There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the Secretary of Defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ‘missile.’ [Secretary Rumsfeld also publicly referred to Flight 93 as the plane that was “shot down” over Pennsylvania.] Col. Kwiatkowski estava a trabalhar no Pentágono em 9 / 11 na sua qualidade de Assuntos Políticos e Militares Officer, no Gabinete do Secretário de Defesa dos Vôo 77, quando supostamente atingido o Pentágono. Ela escreveu, "Houve uma falta de visibilidade sobre os destroços relativamente desmarcadas relvado, onde se situava apenas minutos após o impacto. Para além desta estranha ausência de avião detritos, não havia qualquer sinal do tipo de dano para o Pentágono seria de esperar de uma estrutura de impacto de um grande avião. Esta prova visível ou falta Considerando também pode ter sido evidente para o Secretário da Defesa [Donald Rumsfeld], em que uma infeliz escorregamento da língua a que se refere o slammed em que o avião do Pentágono como "um míssil." [secretário Rumsfeld também publicamente a que se refere o vôo como o 93 avião que foi "abatido" ao longo Pensilvânia.]
“I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. "Eu vi nada de grande significado no ponto de impacto - nenhum avião metal ou carga destroços foi sopra sobre o gramado em frente ao edifício danificado billowed como fumaça de dentro do Pentágono. … [A]ll of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident. … [A] ll de nós staring em que o Pentágono manhã foram de facto olhando para esses destroços, mas o que esperar para ver não era evidente.
“The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. "O mesmo acontece no que diz respeito ao tipo de dano que esperávamos. … But I did not see this kind of damage. … Mas eu não ver este tipo de danos. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight. Em vez disso, a fachada e não tinha um pequeno orifício, não superiores a 20 metros de diâmetro. Embora esta fachada desabou mais tarde, ele permaneceu de pé durante 30 ou 40 minutos, com o tecto permanecendo relativamente linha reta.
“The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. "A cena, em suma, não era o que eu teria esperado a partir de uma greve por uma grande jetliner. Foi, no entanto, exactamente aquilo que se poderia esperar se tivesse um míssil atingiu o Pentágono. … More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day.” Mais informações… é certamente necessária quanto os acontecimentos de 9 / 11 e os acontecimentos que levaram a essa terrível dia. "
The improbability of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 is a major concern of these officers and a growing number of scientists, engineers and architects. The building was 610 feet tall, 47 stories, and would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 pm on 9/11. In the 6 years since 9/11, the Federal government has failed to provide any explanation for the collapse. In addition to the failure to provide an explanation, absolutely no mention of Building 7’s collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission’s “full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.” A improbabilidade de o colapso do World Trade Center Building 7 é uma das grandes preocupações destes oficiais e um número crescente de cientistas, engenheiros e arquitectos. O edifício foi 610 pés de altura, 47 histórias, e teria sido o edifício mais alto em 33 estados. Embora não tenha sido atingida por um avião, que ruiu completamente em uma pilha de escombros em menos de 7 segundos, no 5:20 pm em 9 / 11. Em 6 anos, desde 9 / 11, o governo federal foi incapaz de fornecer qualquer explicação para o colapso. Além da falta de fornecer uma explicação, absolutamente nenhuma menção do Edifício 7 do colapso aparece no 9 / 11 da Comissão "total e completa em conta as circunstâncias que rodearam a 11 de setembro de 2001 ataques terroristas."
Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford, US Marine Corps (ret), an attack pilot with over 300 combat missions, wrote in 2007 to the Michigan Daily, “Our government has been hijacked by means of a ‘new Pearl Harbor’ and a lot of otherwise good and decent people who are gullible enough to think that the first three steel-framed buildings in history fall down because they have some fires that the fire fighter on the scene said could be knocked down with a couple of hoses and through which people walked before they were photographed looking out the holes where the plane hit. One of these, Building 7, was never hit by a plane and even NIST is ashamed to advance a reason for its collapse. And, miracle of miracles, these three buildings just happened to be leased and insured by the same guy who is on tape saying they decided to ‘PULL’ the last one to fall.” Tenente Coronel Shelton Lankford Tenente Coronel Shelton Lankford, E.U. Marine Corps (ret), um ataque piloto combater com mais de 300 missões, escreveu em 2007, para o Michigan Daily, "O nosso governo tem sido invadida por meio de uma" nova Pearl Harbor "e um monte de outras pessoas boas e decentes que estão crédulo o suficiente para pensar que os três primeiros edifícios de aço-enquadrado na história caio porque têm alguns fogos que os bombeiros disse à cena poderia ser derrubado com um casal de mangueiras e caminharam pelas quais as pessoas antes de serem fotografados olhando os buracos onde o avião bater. Um destes, Edifício 7, nunca foi atingido por um avião e até mesmo NIST é uma vergonha para fazer avançar a causa da sua ruptura. E, milagre dos milagres , Estes três edifícios só aconteceu para locação e segurados pela mesma cara que a fita está dizendo que eles decidiram "PULL" o último a cair. "
During his 20 year military career, Col. Lankford’s decorations include the Distinguished Flying Cross, and 32 awards of the Air Medal. Durante seus 20 anos de carreira militar, coronel Lankford's Decorações incluir o Ilustre Flying Cross, e 32 prêmios da Air Medal.
In a statement to this author, Col. Lankford wrote, “September 11, 2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our lifetimes. The evidence of government complicity in the lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of evidence turned up by others that renders the official explanation impossible, may signal the end of the American experiment. It has been used to justify all manners of measures to legalize repression at home and as a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad. Until we demand an independent, honest, and thorough investigation and accountability for those whose action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up, our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest danger.” Em uma declaração a este autor, Col. Lankford escreveu, "11 de setembro de 2001 parece destinado a ser o evento marcante das nossas vidas ea maior teste para a nossa democracia em nossas vidas. As provas de cumplicidade no governo até o lead - eventos, a incapacidade de responder durante o evento, bem como a espantosa falta de forma significativa inquérito depois, assim como o desrespeito das provas transformou-se por outras que torna impossível a explicação oficial, maio sinal do fim do experimento americano. Foi usado para justificar todas as formas de medidas para legalizar repressão em casa e, como pretexto para um comportamento agressivo como um império estrangeiro. Enquanto não procura um independente, honesto, e um inquérito exaustivo e de prestação de contas para aqueles cuja ação e omissão levou a esses acontecimentos e da cobertura - up, a nossa república e permanecer na nossa Constituição o mais sério perigo. "
Lt. Col. Jeff Latas Another harsh critic of the official account of 9/11 is Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, US Air Force (ret). A former combat fighter pilot, Col. Latas is currently a commercial airline pilot. Tenente Coronel Jeff Latas Outra dura crítica do funcionário em conta a 9 / 11 é Tenente Coronel Jeff Latas, E.U. Força Aérea (ret). Um antigo combatente combater piloto, coronel Latas é actualmente uma companhia aérea comercial piloto.
Col. Latas is a member of Pilots for 9/11 Truth. In 2007 he was interviewed by the group’s founder, commercial airline pilot, Rob Balsamo, regarding the group’s documentary video, Pandora’s Black Box, Chapter 2, Flight of American 77, which focuses on the 9/11 Commission’s account of the impact of Flight 77 at the Pentagon and discrepancies with the data from the Flight Data Recorder alleged by the NTSB to be from Flight 77. Col. Latas é um membro de Pilotos para 9 / 11 Truth. Em 2007 ele foi entrevistado pelo fundador do grupo, companhia aérea comercial piloto, Rob Balsamo, no que respeita ao documentário do grupo de vídeo, Pandora's Black Box, capítulo 2, Vôo da American 77, que incide sobre o 9 / 11 da Comissão em conta o impacto do vôo 77, no Pentágono e discrepâncias com os dados do Flight Data Recorder alegados pelo NTSB a ser de Vôo 77.
In the interview, Col. Latas said, “After I did my own analysis of it, it’s obvious that there’s discrepancies between the two stories; between the 9/11 Commission and the flight data recorder information. And I think that’s where we really need to focus a lot of our attention to get the help that we need in order to put pressure on government agencies to actually do a real investigation of 9/11. And not just from a security standpoint, but from even an aviation standpoint, like any accident investigation would actually help the aviators out by finding reasons for things happening.” Na entrevista, o coronel Latas disse, "Depois que fiz a minha própria análise da mesma, é evidente que há discrepâncias entre as duas histórias, entre as 9 / 11 da Comissão de registo dos dados de voo e de informação. E eu acho que 'S, onde realmente necessidade de concentrar muita da nossa atenção para obter a ajuda de que precisamos a fim de exercer pressão sobre as agências governamentais de realmente fazer uma verdadeira investigação de 9 / 11. E não apenas a partir de uma perspectiva de segurança, mas até mesmo de uma vista aérea, como qualquer acidente inquérito teria efectivamente ajudar os aviadores, por razões de encontrar coisas acontecendo. "
A highly decorated fighter pilot, Col. Latas was awarded the Distinguish Flying Cross for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals. His combat experience includes Desert Storm and four tours of duty in Northern and Southern Watch. During his 20-year Air Force career, he also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer, as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and as President, US Air Force Accident Investigation Board. Um grande lutador decorado piloto, foi premiado com o coronel Latas Distinguir Flying Cross de heroísmo, Air quatro medalhas, quatro medalhas de serviço meritório, e nove Aerial Achievement Medalhas. Sua experiência inclui combater Desert Storm e quatro circuitos de direitos do Norte e do Sul Watch. Durante seus 20 anos de carreira da Força Aérea, ele também serviu como Pentágono Armas Exigência Officer, na qualidade de membro da Revisão Quadrienal da Defesa do Pentágono, e como presidente, E.U. Força Aérea Accident Investigation Board.
Col. Latas concluded, “And I think that we Americans need to demand further investigation just to clarify the discrepancies that you’ve [Pilots for 9/11 Truth] found. And I think that we need to be getting on the phone with our Congressmen and women and letting them know that we don’t accept the excuses that we’re hearing now, that we want true investigators to do a true investigation.” Col. Latas, concluiu, "E penso que os americanos precisam de exigir uma investigação mais aprofundada só para esclarecer as discrepâncias que você [Pilotos de 9 / 11 Truth] encontrado. E penso que temos de estar recebendo a falar ao telefone com o nosso Congressistas e mulheres e deixando que eles saibam que nós não aceitamos as desculpas que nós estamos agora audiência, que queremos que os investigadores verdade que fazer uma verdadeira investigação. "
Capt. Eric H. May Capitão Eric H. maio
Commander Ted Muga Comandante Ted Muga
Capt. Eric H. May, US Army (ret), is a former Army Intelligence Officer who also served as an inspector and interpreter for the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty team. He is one of many signers of a petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. In 2005, he wrote: “As a former Army officer, my tendency immediately after 911 was to rally ’round the colors and defend the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country in its time of peril. Capitão Eric H. maio, E.U. Exército (ret), é um ex-oficial do Exército Inteligência que também serviu como um inspector e intérprete para o Intermediário forças nucleares Tratado equipe. Ele é um dos muitos apoiadores de uma petição solicitando um novo inquérito do 9 / 11. Em 2005, ele escreveu: "Como antigo oficial do Exército, a minha tendência foi a de 911 imediatamente após comício" ronda as cores e defender o país contra o que eu pensava era então uma insidiosa, todos os mal intencionados-árabe entidade chamada Al-Qaeda. Na verdade, em abril de 2002, eu então tentou reativar a minha comissão de aposentados para voltar a servir o meu país, no seu tempo de perigo. …
Now I view the 911 event as Professor David Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, views it: as a matter that implies either Agora eu ver as 911 evento como professor David Griffin, autor de The New Pearl Harbor, pontos de vista-lo: como uma questão que implica quer
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse … A) passiva participação da Casa Branca, Bush através de uma deliberada stand-estabelece procedimentos de uma boa defesa que (se seguiram) teria conduzido E.U. ar de activos para uma rápida identificação ea confrontação dos aviões de passageiros que impactado WTC WTC 1 e 2, ou pior …
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle East …” B) ativa a execução de uma parcela desonestos elementos do governo, a começar pela própria Casa Branca, na criação de um espetáculo de destruição que levaria os Estados Unidos em uma invasão do Médio Oriente… "
Commander Ted Muga, US Navy (ret), is a Navy aviator, who, after retirement, had a second career as a commercial airline pilot for Pan-Am. Comandante Ted Muga, E.U. Marinha (ret), é um aviador da Marinha, que, depois de se aposentar, tinha uma segunda carreira de piloto comercial para a companhia aérea Pan-Am.
In a 2007 interview on the Alex Jones Show, Commander Muga stated, “The maneuver at the Pentagon was just a tight spiral coming down out of 7,000 feet. And a commercial aircraft, while they can in fact structurally somewhat handle that maneuver, they are very, very, very difficult. And it would take considerable training. In other words, commercial aircraft are designed for a particular purpose and that is for comfort and for passengers and it’s not for military maneuvers. And while they are structurally capable of doing them, it takes some very, very talented pilots to do that. Em 2007 uma entrevista com o Alex Jones Show, Comandante Muga declarou, "A manobra, o Pentágono foi um pouco apertado espiral próximos descer de 7000 pés. E uma aeronave comercial, ao mesmo tempo que eles podem, de facto, algo estruturalmente alça que manobra, eles são muito, muito, muito difícil. Eo que seria necessário considerável de formação. Em outras palavras, aviões comerciais são projetados para um determinado fim e que é de conforto e de passageiros e não é para manobras militares. E enquanto eles são capazes de estruturalmente fazê-los, é preciso muito, muito talentosos pilotos para o fazer. … I just can’t imagine an amateur even being able to come close to performing a maneuver of that nature. … Eu simplesmente não consegue imaginar um amador mesmo sendo capazes de chegar perto de executar uma manobra desse tipo.
“And as far as hijacking the airplanes, once again getting back to the nature of pilots and airplanes, there is no way that a pilot would give up an airplane to hijackers. "E na medida do seqüestro do avião, mais uma vez voltar à natureza dos pilotos e aviões, não há nenhuma maneira que um piloto daria até um avião para seqüestradores. … I mean, hell, a guy doesn’t give up a TV remote control much less a complicated 757. And so to think that pilots would allow a plane to be taken over by a couple of 5 foot 7, 150 pound guys with a one-inch blade boxcutter is ridiculous. … Quer dizer, inferno, um cara não dá-se uma TV controle remoto muito menos uma complicada 757. E assim a pensar que iria permitir que um avião pilotos de ser tomada a cargo por um jovem de 5 de pé 7, 150 rapazes com uma libra uma pol lâmina boxcutter é ridículo.
“And also in all four planes, if you remember, none of the planes ever switched on their transponder to the hijack code. There’sa very, very simple code that you put in if you suspect that your plane is being hijacked. It takes literally just a split-second for you to put your hand down on the center console and flip it over. And not one of the four planes ever transponded a hijack code, which is most, most unusual. "E também em todos os quatro aviões, se você se lembrar, nenhum dos aviões sempre ligado ao seu código transponder para a adulteração. Há muito, muito simples código que você colocar no caso você suspeita que seu avião está a ser invadida. Demora literalmente apenas uma fração de segundo-para que você colocou sua mão para baixo sobre o centro eo console flip-la mais. E não um dos quatro aviões nunca transponded um código adulteração, o que é mais, muito incomum. …
“Commercial airplanes are very, very complex pieces of machines. And they’re designed for two pilots up there, not just two amateur pilots, but two qualified commercial pilots up there. And to think that you’re going to get an amateur up into the cockpit and fly, much less navigate, it to a designated target, the probability is so low, that it’s bordering on impossible.” "Commercial aviões são muito, muito complexas peças de máquinas. E eles são concebidos para dois pilotos até lá, e não apenas dois pilotos amadores, mas dois pilotos comerciais qualificados até lá. E pensar que você vai chegar até um amador no cockpit e voar, muito menos navegar, é designado para uma meta, a probabilidade é tão baixa, o que fazem fronteira com impossível. "
Col. George Nelson Coronel George Nelson
“In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident,” wrote Col. George Nelson, MBA, US Air Force (ret), a former US Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. "Em todos os meus anos de participação direta e indireta, eu nunca testemunhou nem sequer ouviu falar de uma aeronave perda, onde os destroços foram acessíveis, que o impediu de investigadores encontrar duras provas suficientes para identificar positivamente a marca, modelo e número de registo do específicos aeronaves - e, na maioria dos casos, as causas exactas do acidente ", escreveu coronel George Nelson, MBA, E.U. Força Aérea (ret), um antigo avião da Força Aérea E.U. acidente investigador e do avião peças autoridade.
“The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view,” continued Col. Nelson, a graduate of the US Air Force War College and a 34-year Air Force veteran. "O governo alega que quatro aviões de grande corpo caiu na manhã de setembro 11 2001, resultando na morte de mais de 3000 os seres humanos, ainda não uma peça de avião dura prova foi produzida em uma tentativa de identificar positivamente qualquer um dos quatro aviões. Pelo contrário, parece-me apenas que todos os potenciais elementos de prova foram mantidos deliberadamente escondido da opinião pública ", continuou Coronel Nelson, um estudante de graduação da Força Aérea os E.U. War College e um ano-34 da Força Aérea veterano.
“With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. "Com todos os elementos de prova prontamente disponíveis no site do Pentágono crash, qualquer investigador imparcial racional só poderia concluir que um Boeing 757 não voar para o Pentágono como alegado. Do mesmo modo, com toda a evidência disponível no site crash Pensilvânia, era mais duvidoso um avião de passageiros que causou o óbvio buraco no chão e, certamente, não o Boeing 757 como alegado. …
“As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.” "Como era doloroso e penoso como a perda de vidas inocentes e os remanescentes problemas de saúde de milhares mais, uma mais problemáticos e horrível probabilidade é que tantos americanos parecem estar envolvidos na conspiração mais hediondos da história de nosso país."
Maj. John M. Newman, PhD Maj. John M. Newman, PhD
Capt. Omar Pradhan Capitão Omar Pradhan
Col. Ronald D. Ray Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, US Army (ret), is the former Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. In testimony before a 2005 Congressional briefing, he said, “It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report… Coronel Ronald D. Ray Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, E.U. Exército (ret), é o ex-assistente do director executivo da Agência de Segurança Nacional. Em depoimento perante um briefing 2005 congressional, disse ele, "Compete aos me esta manhã para chamar a sua atenção para a história de Saeed Sheikh, cujo nome completo é Omar Ahmed Saeed Sheikh, e sua surpreendente ascensão ao poder na Al Qaeda, o seu papel crucial no 9 / 11, que é completamente, por completo, faltando a partir do 9 / 11 Relatório da Comissão…
“The 9/11 Commission which studied US intelligence and law enforcement community performance in great detail, (maybe not so much great detail, but they did), neglected to cover the community’s performance during the weeks following the attacks to determine who was responsible for them, not a word about that in the Report. "The 9 / 11 da Comissão que estudou E.U. inteligência e aplicação da lei comunidade desempenho em grande pormenor, (talvez não tanto grande pormenor, mas eles fizeram), negligenciado a cobrir o desempenho da comunidade durante a semana, na sequência dos atentados para determinar que foi responsável por eles, nem uma palavra sobre isso no relatório.
“The Report does discuss the immediate US responses but the immediate investigation is never addressed, and anyone who has closely studied the post-9/11 investigation knows that the first breakthrough came two weeks into the investigation when the money transfers from the United Arab Emirates to the hijackers were uncovered. "O relatório faz discutir a E.U. respostas imediatas, mas a investigação imediata nunca é abordado, e qualquer pessoa que tenha estudado atentamente o inquérito post-9/11 sabe que o primeiro avanço veio em duas semanas o inquérito quando as transferências de dinheiro dos Emirados Árabes Unidos para os seqüestradores foram descobertos.
“Furthermore, if you have studied that investigation, you know there is no disputing that while investigators may have struggled with the identity of the paymaster, they were clear about one thing, he was Al Qaeda’s finance chief. For this reason alone you have to ask why the 9/11 Commission Report never mentions the finance chief’s role as the 9/11 paymaster.” "Além disso, se você tem estudado inquérito que, como você sabe, não existe qualquer litígio que, embora os investigadores possam ter lutado com a identidade do tesoureiro, eles estavam cientes de uma coisa, ele era diretor financeiro da Al-Qaeda. Só por este motivo que você tem que perguntar porque é que o 9 / 11 Relatório da Comissão nunca menciona a financiar o papel do chefe como o 9 / 11 tesoureiro. "
Capt. Omar Pradhan, US Air Force, is a former AWACS command pilot and Flight Instructor at the US Air Force Academy. In a 2007 statement to this author, Capt. Pradhan wrote, “As a proud American, as a distinguished USAF E-3 AWACS Aircraft Commander (with 350+ hours of combat time logged over Afghanistan and Iraq), and as a former US Air Force Academy Flight Instructor, I warmly endorse the professional inquiry and pursuit of comprehensive truth sought by the Pilots for 911 Truth organization and the PatriotsQuestion911 website.” Capitão Omar Pradhan, E.U. Força Aérea, é um ex-piloto e de comando AWACS Flight Instructor os E.U. a Academia da Força Aérea. Em 2007 uma declaração a este autor, Capitão Pradhan escreveu, "Como um orgulho americano, como um distinto USAF E - 3 aviões AWACS Commander (+ de 350 horas de combate ao longo do tempo conectado Afeganistão e Iraque), e como antigo E.U. Air Force Academy Flight Instructor, eu subscrevo calorosamente o profissional eo exercício de inquérito exaustivo verdade procurou por todos os pilotos para a organização e Verdade 911 PatriotsQuestion911 o site. "
Another senior officer questioning the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ronald D. Ray, US Marine Corps (ret), Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan. A highly decorated Vietnam veteran (two Silver Stars, a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart), he was appointed by President George HW Bush to serve on the American Battle Monuments Commission (1990 – 1994), and the 1992 Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces. He was Military Historian and Deputy Director of Field Operations for the US Marine Corps Historical Center, Washington, DC (1990 – 1994). Um outro funcionário superior questionando a conta oficial do 9 / 11 é coronel Ronald D. Ray, E.U. Marine Corps (ret), vice-secretário assistente de Defesa do Presidente Ronald Reagan. Um veterano altamente decorado Vietnã (duas Silver Stars, e um Bronze Star uma Purple Heart), ele foi nomeado pelo Presidente George HW Bush para atuar no American Battle Monumentos Comissão (1990 - 1994), e de 1992 a Presidential Commission sobre a Transmissão de Mulheres nas forças armadas. Ele era Militar O historiador e director-adjunto da Campo de Operações para os E.U. Marine Corps Centro Histórico, Washington, DC (1990 - 1994).
In an interview on Alex Jones’ radio show on June 30, 2006, Col. Ray described the official account of 9/11 as “the dog that doesn’t hunt”, meaning it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. In response to Alex Jones’ question, “Is it safe to say or is the statement accurate that you smell something rotten in the state of Denmark when it comes to 9/11?” Col. Ray replied,“I’m astounded that the conspiracy theory advanced by the administration could in fact be true and the evidence does not seem to suggest that that’s accurate. That’s true.” Em uma entrevista com Alex Jones' show de rádio em 30 de junho de 2006, Col. Ray descrito em conta o oficial de 9 / 11 como "o cão que não caça", significando que não resistem a um exame minucioso. Em resposta a Alex Jones' pergunta: "É seguro dizer ou é exacta a afirmação de que algo lhe cheiro podre no Estado da Dinamarca, quando se trata de 9 / 11?" Ray coronel respondeu, "estou espanta que a teoria da conspiração avançados pela administração poderia, de facto, ser verdadeira e os elementos de prova não parece sugerir que isso é exacto. Isso é verdade. "
“After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back,” wrote Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, US Air Force (ret), in a statement to this author. "Após 4 anos de investigação desde aposentadoria, em 2002, estou 100% convencido de que os atentados de 11 de setembro de 2001 foi planejada, organizada e treasonous cometidos por criminosos que se infiltraram os mais elevados níveis de nosso governo. Chegou o momento de tomar nosso país de volta ", escreveu Tenente Coronel Guy S. Razer, MS, E.U. Força Aérea (ret), em uma declaração para o autor.
A retired fighter pilot, Col. Razer served as an instructor at the US Air Force Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program and flew combat missions over Iraq. He continued, “The ‘collapse’ of WTC Building 7 shows beyond any doubt that the demolitions were pre-planned. There is simply no way to demolish a 47-story building (on fire) over a coffee break. It is also impossible to report the building’s collapse before it happened, as BBC News did, unless it was pre-planned. Further damning evidence is Larry Silverstein’s video taped confession in which he states ‘they made that decision to pull [WTC 7] and we watched the building collapse.’ Um piloto aposentado lutador, Col. Razer serviu como um instrutor os E.U. a Força Aérea Fighter Armas e Escola da OTAN Tática Leadership Program e voou combater missões ao Iraque. Ele continuou, "A" colapso "do WTC Building 7 mostra para além de qualquer dúvida que as demolições foram pré-programadas. Existe simplesmente nenhuma maneira de demolir um edifício de 47 andares (com fogo) durante um coffee break. Também é impossível o relatório, o colapso do edifício antes que aconteceu, como fez BBC News, a menos que foi pré-planificadas. Outras provas condenatórias é Larry Silverstein de vídeo do confissão gravada em que ele afirma "que fizeram essa decisão para puxar [WTC 7], e vimos a construção colapso."
“We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to ‘support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic’. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it,” he concluded. "Não podemos deixar que o exercício da justiça falhar. Aqueles de nós, os militares tomaram um juramento para" apoiar e defender a Constituição dos Estados Unidos contra todos os inimigos, externa e interna ". Só porque temos aposentado que não faz juramento inválido , Pelo que não é apenas a nossa responsabilidade, é nosso dever expor os verdadeiros autores de 9 / 11 e levá-los à justiça, não importa o quão duro é, quanto tempo demora, ou o quanto nós temos de sofrer para fazer isso ", Concluiu.
Maj. Scott Ritter Maj. Scott Ritter
Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer Tenente Coronel Anthony Shaffer
Maj. Scott Ritter, US Marine Corps, is a former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer who also served as Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq 1991 - 1998. In 2005, he said: “I, like the others, are frustrated by the 9/11 Commission Report, by the lack of transparency on the part of the United States government, both in terms of the executive branch and the legislative branch when it comes to putting out on the table all facts known to the 9/11 case.” Maj. Scott Ritter, E.U. Marine Corps, é um ex-Marine Corps Intelligence Officer que também serviu como Inspector-Chefe Armas para a Comissão Especial das Nações Unidas no Iraque 1991 - 1998. Em 2005, ele disse: "Eu, tal como os outros, estão frustrados com o 9 / 11 Relatório da Comissão, pela falta de transparência por parte do governo dos Estados Unidos, tanto em termos do poder executivo e do legislativo, quando se trata de colocar para fora em cima da mesa todos os factos conhecidos da 9 / 11 caso. "
Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD, US Army (ret), former Director of the US Army Depleted Uranium Project and 30-year veteran, had this to say about the explosion at the Pentagon on 9/11, “When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.” Maj. Douglas Rokke, PhD, E.U. Exército (ret), antigo Director do Exército os E.U. urânio empobrecido Projeto e veterano de 30 anos, tinha a dizer sobre esta a explosão no Pentágono em 9 / 11, "Quando você olha para o conjunto thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile’s impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile. And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.”
The 9/11 Commission Report asserts that only three of the alleged hijackers were known to US intelligence agencies prior to 9/11: Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, and Khalid al-Mihdar. There is no mention in the Report that the names and photographs of alleged hijacker Marwan al-Shehhi and alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been identified by the Department of Defense anti-terrorist program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to 9/11 and that they were known to be affiliates of al-Qaida. Able Danger also identified Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdar.
In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee in 2006, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, US Army Reserve, former Chief of the Army’s Controlled HUMINT (Human Intelligence) Program, overseeing Army Intelligence and Security Command’s global controlled HUMINT efforts, stated: “[B]asic law enforcement investigative techniques, with 21st Century data mining and analytical tools … resulted in the establishment of a new form of intelligence collection – and the identification of Mohammed Atta and several other of the 9-11 terrorists as having links to Al Qaeda leadership a full year in advance of the attacks. …
“After contact by two separate members of the ABLE DANGER team, … the 9-11 [Commission] staff refused to perform any in-depth review or investigation of the issues that were identified to them. … It was their job to do a thorough investigation of these claims – to not simply dismiss them based on what many now believe was a ‘preconceived’ conclusion to the 9-11 story they wished to tell. … I consider this a failure of the 9-11 staff – a failure that the 9-11 Commissioners themselves were victimized by – and continue to have perpetrated on them by the staff as is evidenced by their recent, groundless conclusion that ABLE DANGER’s findings were ‘urban legend’.”
A 23-year military intelligence veteran, Col. Shaffer was recently awarded the Bronze Star for bravery in Afghanistan. In a 2005 interview on Fox News, Col Shaffer asked, “Why did this operation, which was created in ‘99 to target Al Qaeda globally, offensively, why was that turned off in the Spring of 2001, four months before we were attacked? I can’t answer that, either. I can tell you I was ordered out of the operation directly by a two-star general.”
Supporting Col. Shaffer’s statement, Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, US Navy, currently Commanding Officer of the guided-missile cruiser USS Leyte Gulf and former head of the Able Danger data mining program, stated in 2005: “I will not discuss this outside of my chain of command. I have briefed the Department of the Army, the Special Operations Command and the office of (Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence) Dr. Cambone as well as the 9/11 Commission. My story has remained consistent. Atta was identified by Able Danger in January/February 2000.” Capt. Phillpott is a US Naval Academy graduate, who during his 23 years of Navy service has been awarded the Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, three Meritorious Service Medals, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, two Navy Commendation Medals, and the Navy Achievement Medal.
Joel Skousen
Gen. Albert Stubblebine Former US Marine Corps fighter pilot Joel M. Skousen also questions the official account of 9/11. After his military service, Mr. Skousen served as Chairman of the Conservative National Committee in Washington DC and Executive Editor of Conservative Digest.
“In the March 2005 issue, PM [Popular Mechanics] magazine singled out 16 issues or claims of the 9/11 skeptics that point to government collusion and systematically attempted to debunk each one. Of the 16, most missed the mark and almost half were straw men arguments - either ridiculous arguments that few conspiracists believed or restatements of the arguments that were highly distorted so as to make them look weaker than they really were. …
“I am one of those who claim there are factual arguments pointing to conspiracy, and that truth is not served by taking cheap shots at those who see gaping flaws in the government story … There is significant evidence that the aircraft impacts did not cause the collapse [of the Twin Towers] …
The issues of the penetration hole [at the Pentagon] and the lack of large pieces of debris simply do not jive with the official story, but they are explainable if you include the parking lot video evidence that shows a huge white explosion at impact. This cannot happen with an aircraft laden only with fuel. It can only happen in the presence of high explosives.”
Major General Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret), former Commanding General of US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), is a strong critic of the official account of 9/11. In a 2006 video documentary he said, “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?”
During his 32-year Army career, Gen. Stubblebine also commanded the US Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the US Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Gen. Stubblebine is one of the inductees into the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
“There is a well-organized cover-up of the events of 11 Sep 2001. The 9/11 Commission was a white-washed farce. There is evidence that US Government officials had advance knowledge of and are probably implicated in the events of 9/11,” wrote retired military physician, Col. James R. Uhl, MD, US Army (ret), in a statement to this author.
“A huge body of physical evidence has been ignored, suppressed, and ridiculed by the media and by our Government. Why did WTC 7 collapse? It was never hit by an airplane and was apparently brought down by explosives. How could Al-Qaida terrorists have had access and time to plant bombs in a top secret installation? Why did the 9/11 Commission fail to seek the reason for the WTC 7 collapse?” continued Col. Uhl, a 38-year Army veteran, who served in several theaters of operations, from Viet Nam through Iraq.
Capt. Russ Wittenberg Capt. Russ Wittenberg, US Air Force, is a former US Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions and a retired commercial pilot, who flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years.
According to Capt. Wittenberg, “The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total BS, plain and simple.
In the 2007 documentary video, 9/11 Ripple Effect,he said “I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.
“I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist, to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding its design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.” Regarding Flight 77, which allegedly hit the Pentagon, Capt. Wittenberg said, ”The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall. The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous … It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building. There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”
Col. Ann Wright
Capt. Gregory Zeigler Another senior officer questioning the official account of 9/11 is Col. Ann Wright, US Army (ret), who said in a 2007 interview with Richard Greene on the Air America Radio Network, “It’s incredible some of these things that still are unanswered. The 9/11 Report — that was totally inadequate. I mean the questions that anybody has after reading that.”
Col. Wright is one of three US State Department officials to publicly resign in direct protest of the invasion of Iraq in March, 2003. She served for 13 years on active duty and 16 additional years on reserve duty in the US Army. She joined the Foreign Service in 1987 and served for 16 years as a US Diplomat. She served as Deputy Chief of Mission of US Embassies in Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Afghanistan and she helped reopen the US Embassy in Kabul in December, 2001.
She continued in her interview: “How could our national intelligence and defense operations be so inept that they could not communicate; that they could not scramble jets; that they could not take defensive action? And I totally agree. I always thought the Pentagon had all sorts of air defense sort of equipment around it; that they could take out anything that was coming at it. And for a plane to be able to just fly low right over Washington and slam into that thing is just — I mean, you still just shake your head. How in the world could that happen?”
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, is a former US Army Intelligence Officer. In a 2006 statement to this author, Capt. Zeigler wrote, “I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. That was when I realized that the perpetrators had made a colossal blunder in collapsing the South Tower first, rather than the North Tower, which had been hit more directly and earlier.
“Other anomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers’ names appearing in none of the published flight passenger lists, BBC reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of WTC 1 and 2 and WTC 7, the lack of identifiable Boeing 757 wreckage at the Pentagon, the impossibility of ordinary cell phone (as opposed to Airfone) calls being made consistently from passenger aircraft at cruising altitude, etc., etc., etc.”
Shortly after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, a group of over 100 prominent Americans signed a petition urging Congress to immediately reinvestigate 9/11. In addition to two former senior CIA officials and several US State Department veterans, the signers included Lt. Col. Robert Bowman and Capt. Eric H. May, both mentioned above.
The petition stated, in part, “We want truthful answers to questions such as:
1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?
2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?
3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?
4. Why hasn’ta single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?
5. Why haven’t authorities in the US and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”
These questions and many others still remain unanswered three years after the petition was submitted and six years after the terrible events of 9/11. As the statements of these twenty-five former US military officers demonstrate, the need for a new thorough, and independent investigation of 9/11 is not a matter of partisan politics, nor the demand of irresponsible, deranged, or disloyal Americans. It is instead a matter of the utmost importance for America’s security and the future of the entire world.
See More: USA NewsHave Your Say: 25 USA Military Officers Challenge Official 9/11 Account
Please note, only selected comments will be published.
Or discuss this report in our our new forums
3 Responses to “25 USA Military Officers Challenge Official 9/11 Account”
kotsios
Posted: May 25th, 2008 at 4:06 am | Link to thispingback:
Posted: May 25th, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Link to this
US Military Offices Question 9/11 Fables | jamie.comMy poor children
Posted: May 26th, 2008 at 9:40 am | Link to thisReplyDear All, Just as important, AE911truth.com (or .org)has about 300 scientists,engineers and such that PROVE the buildings could not have exploded that way without preplanted explosives! I saw on video, one 6 inch thick steel beam turn to dust as it stood. The history channel just put on a 9/11 show filled with down right lies “Fires inside the buildings reached over 2000 degrees” a lie, no steel ever saw tematures above 800-900 (they tested it)but more important was the hero firefighters themselves in the interviews saying ” we saw belts of explosives” going all around and up and down the building” check Capt. Karin Deshores testamony,she is a American hero, I hope she can enjoy her retirement, anyone know if she has come up missing? everything is so obvious, most people know that at least building #7 was imploded via a countdown.
Free Newsletter 
Loading ... Related News
- OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF 9/11 FLIGHT CONTRADICTED BY GOVERNMENT’S OWN DATA
- US Navy ‘Top Gun’ Pilot Questions 9/11
- 9/11 Truth - New Study Raises More Questions
- New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon
- Pentagon alerts 35,000 soldiers for Iraq deployment
Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines
- Students Denied Legal Aid
- Over 60% of People Do Not Trust the Government
- Lorry drivers to shut down London roads in protest
- Tories pledge to curb use of CCTV cameras
- Path Intelligence - Phorm for shopping centres?
- Concerns grow over snooping watchdog
- ‘We Are Stuck’ With Guantanamo, Gates Says
- Indictment and Trial of Bush and Cheney
- The War on Drugs - ‘30 Years of Failure’
- Indymedia Responds to SHIfT article
More Breaking News
Archive
- May 2008 Maio 2008
- April 2008 Abril 2008
- March 2008 Março 2008
- February 2008 Fevereiro 2008
- January 2008 Janeiro 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007 Agosto 2007
- July 2007 Julho 2007
- June 2007 Junho 2007
- May 2007 Maio 2007
- April 2007 Abril 2007
- March 2007 Março 2007
theres nothing to say really…plain and simple nothing is being done…If this awful truth is not uncovered then i fear for the fate of the people not only in the states but the rest of the world as well..really dissapointing